Towards clinical trials of lie detection with fMRI

被引:12
作者
Hakun, J. G. [1 ]
Ruparel, K. [1 ]
Seelig, D. [1 ]
Busch, E. [1 ]
Loughead, J. W. [1 ]
Gur, R. C. [1 ]
Langleben, D. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Treatment Res Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
BRAIN ACTIVITY; DECEPTION; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1080/17470910802188370
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Recent reports of successful fMRI-based discrimination between lie and truth in single subjects raised the interest of prospective users and a public concern about the potential scope of this technology. The increased scrutiny highlighted the lack of controlled oreal lifeo, i.e. prospective clinical trials of this technology that conform to the common standards of medical device development. The ethics of conducting such trials given the paucity of data on fMRI-based lie detection has also been questioned. To probe the potential issues of translating the laboratory research into practice, we conducted a case study in which we adapted the standard Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT), a well-established model of producing deception, to the common scenario of lying on a resume. The task consisted of questions about pertinent items on the subject's resume, three of which could be independently verified as truth (KNOWN) and three that could not be verified and were thus termed UNKNOWN. The subject had an incentive to lie on all UNKNOWN items, and on debriefing confirmed that he had done so. Data was preprocessed, masked with a priori regions of interest, thresholded, and qualitatively evaluated for consistency with the previously reported prefronto-parietal Lie Truth pattern. Deceptive responses to two out of the three UNKNOWN items were associated with the predicted prefronto-parietal fMRI pattern. In the third UNKNOWN this pattern was absent, and instead, increased limbic (amygdala and hippocampus) response was observed. Based on published prefronto-parietal Lie response pattern, only the first two items could be categorized as Lie. If confirmed, this demonstration of amygdala and hippocampus activation in a Lie Truth contrast illustrates the need to integrate the limbic system and its emotional and cognitive correlates into the existing model of deception. Our experiment suggests an approach to a naturalistic scenario and the research questions that need to be answered in order to set the stage for prospective clinical trials of fMRI-based lie detection.
引用
收藏
页码:518 / 527
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Deceiving others: Distinct neural responses of the prefrontal cortex and amygdala in simple fabrication and deception with social interactions
    Abe, Nobuhito
    Suzuki, Maki
    Mori, Etsuro
    Itoh, Masatoshi
    Fujii, Toshikatsu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 19 (02) : 287 - 295
  • [2] [Anonymous], POLYGRAPH LIE DETECT
  • [3] The new lie detectors: Neuroscience, deception, and the courts
    Appelbaum, Paul S.
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2007, 58 (04) : 460 - 462
  • [4] Ashburner J, 2000, MED RAD DIA IMG, P285
  • [5] TIME COURSE EPI OF HUMAN BRAIN-FUNCTION DURING TASK ACTIVATION
    BANDETTINI, PA
    WONG, EC
    HINKS, RS
    TIKOFSKY, RS
    HYDE, JS
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1992, 25 (02) : 390 - 397
  • [6] Dale AM, 1999, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V8, P109, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:2/3<109::AID-HBM7>3.3.CO
  • [7] 2-N
  • [8] Classifying spatial patterns of brain activity with machine learning methods: Application to lie detection
    Davatzikos, C
    Ruparel, K
    Fan, Y
    Shen, DG
    Acharyya, M
    Loughead, JW
    Gur, RC
    Langleben, DD
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2005, 28 (03) : 663 - 668
  • [9] Eck Marcel., 1970, LIES TRUTH
  • [10] DETECTION MEASURES IN REAL-LIFE CRIMINAL GUILTY KNOWLEDGE TESTS
    ELAAD, E
    GINTON, A
    JUNGMAN, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 77 (05) : 757 - 767