New d-dimer threshold for Japanese patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a retrospective cohort study

被引:1
|
作者
Takahashi, Jin [1 ]
Shiga, Takashi [1 ,2 ]
Fukuyama, Yuita [1 ]
Hoshina, Yuiko [3 ]
Homma, Yosuke [1 ]
Mizobe, Michiko [1 ]
Numata, Kenji [1 ]
Inoue, Tetsuya [1 ]
Funakoshi, Hiraku [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Med Ctr, Dept Emergency & Crit Care Med, 3-4-32 Todaijima, Chiba 2790001, Japan
[2] Int Univ Hlth & Welf, Dept Emergency Med, Minato Ku, 1-4-3 Mita, Tokyo 1088329, Japan
[3] Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Med Ctr, Div Strateg Planning & Anal, 3-4-32 Todaijima, Chiba 2790001, Japan
关键词
Pulmonary embolism; New d-dimer threshold; Emergency department; Japan; Factor V Leiden; Prothrombin gene G20210A mutations; FACTOR-V-LEIDEN; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT PATIENTS; RULE-OUT CRITERIA; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; MANAGEMENT; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MUTATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12245-019-0242-y
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE), the d-dimer threshold is based on studies conducted in Western countries, where the incidence rate is 5 times higher than that in Asian countries, including Japan. If we could elevate the d-dimer threshold based on the low pre-test probability in the Japanese population, we could omit the computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) which might lead to radiation exposure and contrast-induced nephropathy. Therefore, we aimed to determine a new d-dimer threshold specific to Japanese individuals.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study at an emergency department in Japan, using medical charts collected from January 2013 to July 2017. We included patients whose d-dimer were measured for suspicion of PE with low or intermediate probability of PE and CTPA were performed. The primary outcome was failure rate of the new d-dimer threshold, defined as the rate of PE detected by CTPA among patients with d-dimer under the new threshold ranging from 1000 to 1500 mu g/L by 100. The new d-dimer threshold was appropriate if the upper limit of 95% confidence interval of the failure rate of PE was approximately 3%.ResultsIn 395 patients included, the number of patients with PE was 24 (the prevalence was 6.1%). If the d-dimer threshold was 1100 mu g/L, the failure rate was 0% (0/119), the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the failure rate was 3.1%, and 30% (119/395) of the CTPA might be omitted.ConclusionThe new d-dimer threshold could safely exclude PE. This result can be generalized to other Asian populations with a lower incidence of PE. Further prospective studies will be needed.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria vs D-dimer testing in low-risk patients for pulmonary embolism: a retrospective study
    Bokobza, J.
    Aubry, A.
    Nakle, N.
    Vincent-Cassy, C.
    Pateron, D.
    Devilliers, C.
    Riou, B.
    Ray, P.
    Freund, Y.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 32 (06) : 609 - 613
  • [42] Prognostic value of D-dimer in elderly patients with Pulmonary Embolism
    Friz, Hernan Polo
    Buzzini, Chiara
    Orenti, Annalisa
    Punzi, Veronica
    Molteni, Mauro
    Primitz, Laura
    d'Oro, Luca Cavalieri
    Arpaia, Guido
    Boracchi, Patrizia
    Cimminiello, Claudio
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2016, 42 (03) : 386 - 392
  • [43] Diagnostic value of D-dimer in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism:: Results from a multicentre outcome study
    Parent, Florence
    Maitre, Sophie
    Meyer, Guy
    Raherison, Chantal
    Mal, Herve
    Lancar, Remi
    Couturaud, Francis
    Mottier, Dominique
    Girard, Philippe
    Simonneau, Gerald
    Leroyer, Christophe
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2007, 120 (02) : 195 - 200
  • [44] Combined measurement of factor XIII and D-dimer is helpful for differential diagnosis in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
    Tang, Ning
    Sun, Ziyong
    Li, Dengju
    Yang, Jun
    Yin, Shiyu
    Guan, Qing
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2017, 55 (12) : 1948 - 1953
  • [45] Assessment of the Utilization of Validated Diagnostic Predictive Tools and D-Dimer in the Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study from a Public Hospital in New York City
    Kharawala, Amrin
    Seo, Jiyoung
    Barzallo, Diego
    Romero, Gabriel Hernandez
    Demirhan, Yunus Emre
    Duarte, Gustavo J.
    Vegivinti, Charan Thej Reddy
    Hache-Marliere, Manuel
    Balasubramanian, Prasanth
    Santos, Heitor Tavares
    Nagraj, Sanjana
    Alhuarrat, Majd Al Deen
    Karamanis, Dimitrios
    Varrias, Dimitrios
    Palaiodimos, Leonidas
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (11)
  • [46] D-dimer can help differentiate suspected pulmonary embolism patients that require anti-coagulation
    Narang, Jatin
    Nowacki, Amy S.
    Seballos, Spencer S.
    Wang, Philip R.
    Mace, Sharon E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 45 : 361 - 367
  • [47] Application of a decision rule and a D-dimer assay in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism
    Gibson, Nadine S.
    Douma, Renee A.
    Squizzato, Alessandro
    Sohne, Maaike
    Buller, Harry R.
    Gerdes, Victor E. A.
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2010, 103 (04) : 849 - 854
  • [48] D-dimer assays - A help or hindrance in suspected pulmonary thromboembolism assessment?
    Bayes, H. K.
    O'Dowd, C. A.
    Glassford, N. J.
    McKay, A.
    Davidson, S.
    JOURNAL OF POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2011, 57 (02) : 109 - 114
  • [49] D-dimer for risk stratification in haemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary embolism
    Keller, Karsten
    Beule, Johannes
    Schulz, Andreas
    Coldewey, Meike
    Dippold, Wolfgang
    Balzer, Joern Oliver
    ADVANCES IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 60 (02): : 204 - 210
  • [50] A retrospective evaluation of the age-adjusted d-dimer versus the conventional d-dimer for pulmonary embolism
    Sheele, Johnathan M.
    Tang, Annie
    Farhan, Obada
    Morris, Nathan
    BLOOD COAGULATION & FIBRINOLYSIS, 2018, 29 (03) : 344 - 349