New d-dimer threshold for Japanese patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a retrospective cohort study

被引:1
|
作者
Takahashi, Jin [1 ]
Shiga, Takashi [1 ,2 ]
Fukuyama, Yuita [1 ]
Hoshina, Yuiko [3 ]
Homma, Yosuke [1 ]
Mizobe, Michiko [1 ]
Numata, Kenji [1 ]
Inoue, Tetsuya [1 ]
Funakoshi, Hiraku [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Med Ctr, Dept Emergency & Crit Care Med, 3-4-32 Todaijima, Chiba 2790001, Japan
[2] Int Univ Hlth & Welf, Dept Emergency Med, Minato Ku, 1-4-3 Mita, Tokyo 1088329, Japan
[3] Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Med Ctr, Div Strateg Planning & Anal, 3-4-32 Todaijima, Chiba 2790001, Japan
关键词
Pulmonary embolism; New d-dimer threshold; Emergency department; Japan; Factor V Leiden; Prothrombin gene G20210A mutations; FACTOR-V-LEIDEN; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT PATIENTS; RULE-OUT CRITERIA; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; MANAGEMENT; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MUTATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12245-019-0242-y
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE), the d-dimer threshold is based on studies conducted in Western countries, where the incidence rate is 5 times higher than that in Asian countries, including Japan. If we could elevate the d-dimer threshold based on the low pre-test probability in the Japanese population, we could omit the computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) which might lead to radiation exposure and contrast-induced nephropathy. Therefore, we aimed to determine a new d-dimer threshold specific to Japanese individuals.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study at an emergency department in Japan, using medical charts collected from January 2013 to July 2017. We included patients whose d-dimer were measured for suspicion of PE with low or intermediate probability of PE and CTPA were performed. The primary outcome was failure rate of the new d-dimer threshold, defined as the rate of PE detected by CTPA among patients with d-dimer under the new threshold ranging from 1000 to 1500 mu g/L by 100. The new d-dimer threshold was appropriate if the upper limit of 95% confidence interval of the failure rate of PE was approximately 3%.ResultsIn 395 patients included, the number of patients with PE was 24 (the prevalence was 6.1%). If the d-dimer threshold was 1100 mu g/L, the failure rate was 0% (0/119), the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the failure rate was 3.1%, and 30% (119/395) of the CTPA might be omitted.ConclusionThe new d-dimer threshold could safely exclude PE. This result can be generalized to other Asian populations with a lower incidence of PE. Further prospective studies will be needed.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] D-dimer in patients infected with COVID-19 and suspected pulmonary embolism
    Garcia-Olive, Ignasi
    Sintes, Helena
    Radua, Joaquim
    Abad Capa, Jorge
    Rosell, Antoni
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 169
  • [22] Clinical usefulness of D-dimer testing in cancer patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
    Righini, M
    Le Gal, G
    De Lucia, S
    Roy, PM
    Meyer, G
    Aujesky, D
    Bounameaux, H
    Perrier, A
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2006, 95 (04) : 715 - 719
  • [23] Raising the D-dimer threshold for ruling out pulmonary embolism: A single-site, observational study with a historical comparison
    Banks, Colin
    Gangathimmaiah, Vinay
    Emeto, Theophilus, I
    Jones, Leonie
    Furyk, Jeremy
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2023, 35 (02) : 200 - 204
  • [24] D-dimer Testing in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism and Impaired Renal Function
    Karami-Djurabi, Reza
    Klok, Frederikus A.
    Kooiman, Judith
    Velthuis, Sophie I.
    Nijkeuter, Mathilde
    Huisman, Menno V.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 122 (11) : 1050 - 1053
  • [25] Decision-Making with D-Dimer in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism
    Sendama, Wezi
    Musgrave, Kathryn M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 131 (12) : 1438 - 1443
  • [26] Capnometry in suspected pulmonary embolism with positive D-dimer in the field
    Tadeja Hernja Rumpf
    Miljenko Križmarić
    Štefek Grmec
    Critical Care, 13
  • [27] USE OF THE D-DIMER FOR DETECTING PULMONARY EMBOLISM IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
    Glober, Nancy
    Tainter, Christopher R.
    Brennan, Jesse
    Darocki, Mark
    Klingfus, Morgan
    Choi, Michelle
    Derksen, Brenna
    Rudolf, Frances
    Wardi, Gabriel
    Castillo, Edward
    Chan, Theodore
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 54 (05) : 585 - 592
  • [28] Capnometry in suspected pulmonary embolism with positive D-dimer in the field
    Rumpf, Tadeja Hernja
    Krizmaric, Miljenko
    Grmec, Stefek
    CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 13 (06): : R196
  • [29] The place of D-dimer testing in an integrated approach of patients suspected of pulmonary embolism
    de Moerloose, P
    Michiels, JJ
    Bounameaux, H
    SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 1998, 24 (04) : 409 - 412
  • [30] Potential Impact of Adjusting the Threshold of the Quantitative D-dimer Based on Pretest Probability of Acute Pulmonary Embolism
    Kabrhel, Christopher
    Courtney, D. Mark
    Camargo, Carlos A.
    Moore, Christopher L.
    Richman, Peter B.
    Plewa, Michael C.
    Nordenholtz, Kristen E.
    Smithline, Howard A.
    Beam, Daren M.
    Brown, Michael D.
    Kline, Jeffrey A.
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 16 (04) : 325 - 332