New d-dimer threshold for Japanese patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a retrospective cohort study

被引:1
|
作者
Takahashi, Jin [1 ]
Shiga, Takashi [1 ,2 ]
Fukuyama, Yuita [1 ]
Hoshina, Yuiko [3 ]
Homma, Yosuke [1 ]
Mizobe, Michiko [1 ]
Numata, Kenji [1 ]
Inoue, Tetsuya [1 ]
Funakoshi, Hiraku [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Med Ctr, Dept Emergency & Crit Care Med, 3-4-32 Todaijima, Chiba 2790001, Japan
[2] Int Univ Hlth & Welf, Dept Emergency Med, Minato Ku, 1-4-3 Mita, Tokyo 1088329, Japan
[3] Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Med Ctr, Div Strateg Planning & Anal, 3-4-32 Todaijima, Chiba 2790001, Japan
关键词
Pulmonary embolism; New d-dimer threshold; Emergency department; Japan; Factor V Leiden; Prothrombin gene G20210A mutations; FACTOR-V-LEIDEN; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT PATIENTS; RULE-OUT CRITERIA; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; MANAGEMENT; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MUTATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12245-019-0242-y
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE), the d-dimer threshold is based on studies conducted in Western countries, where the incidence rate is 5 times higher than that in Asian countries, including Japan. If we could elevate the d-dimer threshold based on the low pre-test probability in the Japanese population, we could omit the computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) which might lead to radiation exposure and contrast-induced nephropathy. Therefore, we aimed to determine a new d-dimer threshold specific to Japanese individuals.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study at an emergency department in Japan, using medical charts collected from January 2013 to July 2017. We included patients whose d-dimer were measured for suspicion of PE with low or intermediate probability of PE and CTPA were performed. The primary outcome was failure rate of the new d-dimer threshold, defined as the rate of PE detected by CTPA among patients with d-dimer under the new threshold ranging from 1000 to 1500 mu g/L by 100. The new d-dimer threshold was appropriate if the upper limit of 95% confidence interval of the failure rate of PE was approximately 3%.ResultsIn 395 patients included, the number of patients with PE was 24 (the prevalence was 6.1%). If the d-dimer threshold was 1100 mu g/L, the failure rate was 0% (0/119), the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the failure rate was 3.1%, and 30% (119/395) of the CTPA might be omitted.ConclusionThe new d-dimer threshold could safely exclude PE. This result can be generalized to other Asian populations with a lower incidence of PE. Further prospective studies will be needed.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] New d-dimer threshold for Japanese patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a retrospective cohort study
    Jin Takahashi
    Takashi Shiga
    Yuita Fukuyama
    Yuiko Hoshina
    Yosuke Homma
    Michiko Mizobe
    Kenji Numata
    Tetsuya Inoue
    Hiraku Funakoshi
    International Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2019, 12
  • [2] Use of D-dimer for the exclusion of new pulmonary embolism in anticoagulated patients: A multicenter retrospective study
    Beaudoin, Etienne
    Kaka, Shaima
    Gagnon, Elisabeth
    Duriyage, Andreanne
    Boulais, Isabelle
    Le Templier, Genevieve
    Toupin, Dominique
    Le Gal, Gregoire
    Gouin, Bobby
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2022, 212 : 19 - 21
  • [3] D-Dimer for risk stratification in patients with acute pulmonary embolism
    Becattini, Cecilia
    Lignani, Alessandra
    Masotti, Luca
    Forte, Maria Beatrice
    Agnelli, Giancarlo
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2012, 33 (01) : 48 - 57
  • [4] A higher D-dimer threshold for predicting pulmonary embolism in patients with COVID-19: a retrospective study
    Ventura-Diaz, Sofia
    Quintana-Perez, Juan, V
    Gil-Boronat, Almudena
    Herrero-Huertas, Marina
    Gorospe-Sarasua, Luis
    Montilla, Jose
    Acosta-Batlle, Jose
    Blazquez-Sanchez, Javier
    Vicente-Bartulos, Agustina
    EMERGENCY RADIOLOGY, 2020, 27 (06) : 679 - 689
  • [5] A higher D-dimer threshold for predicting pulmonary embolism in patients with COVID-19: a retrospective study
    Sofía Ventura-Díaz
    Juan V. Quintana-Pérez
    Almudena Gil-Boronat
    Marina Herrero-Huertas
    Luis Gorospe-Sarasúa
    José Montilla
    Jóse Acosta-Batlle
    Javier Blázquez-Sánchez
    Agustina Vicente-Bártulos
    Emergency Radiology, 2020, 27 : 679 - 689
  • [6] Validation of a new D-dimer microparticle enzyme immunoassay (AxSYM D-Dimer) in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE)
    Ghanima, W.
    Sandset, P. M.
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2007, 120 (04) : 471 - 476
  • [7] Could D-dimer provide a definitive diagnosis in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism?
    Gibson, Nadine S.
    Bueller, Harry R.
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2006, 3 (12): : 654 - 655
  • [8] Inappropriate Use of D-Dimer Assay and Pulmonary CT Angiography in the Evaluation of Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism
    Yin, Fang
    Wilson, Thomas
    Della Fave, Albert
    Larsen, Moira
    Yoon, Jenni
    Nugusie, Binyam
    Freeland, Howard
    Chow, Robert Dobbin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2012, 27 (01) : 74 - 79
  • [9] Assessment of the Safety and Efficiency of Using an Age-Adjusted D-dimer Threshold to Exclude Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
    Woller, Scott C.
    Stevens, Scott M.
    Adams, Daniel M.
    Evans, R. Scott
    Lloyd, James F.
    Snow, Gregory L.
    Bledsoe, Joseph R.
    Gay, David Z.
    Patten, Richard M.
    Aston, Valerie T.
    Elliott, C. Gregory
    CHEST, 2014, 146 (06) : 1444 - 1451
  • [10] Obesity as a Predictor for Pulmonary Embolism and Performance of the Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Strategy in Obese Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
    Gaugler, Jan O.
    Righini, Marc
    Robert-Ebadi, Helia
    Sanchez, Olivier
    Roy, Pierre-Marie
    Verschuren, Franck
    Miranda, Sebastien
    Delluc, Aurelien
    Le Gal, Gregoire
    Tritschler, Tobias
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2024, 124 (01) : 49 - 57