Cardiac troponin T in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging

被引:7
|
作者
Higgins, John V. [1 ]
Watson, Robert E., Jr. [4 ]
Jaffe, Allan S. [3 ]
Dalzell, Connie [2 ]
Acker, Nancy [2 ]
Felmlee, Joel P. [4 ]
Asirvatham, Samuel J. [2 ]
Cha, Yong-Mei [2 ]
Friedman, Paul A. [2 ]
Kapa, Suraj [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Cardiovasc Dis, Omaha, NE USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Heart Rhythm Serv, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Cardiovasc Dis, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Radiol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Div Cardiovasc Dis, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Cardiac pacemaker; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Cardiac troponin; CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATORS; IN-VIVO; PERMANENT PACEMAKERS; 1.5; TESLA; SAFETY; LEADS; MRI; VITRO; ASSAY;
D O I
10.1007/s10840-015-0064-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been safely performed in many patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) using institution-specific protocols. A potential risk of MRI is myocardial heating and cardiac injury, which might be detectable with cardiac Troponin (cTn). We evaluated this in patients with CIEDs undergoing MRI. Prospective data were collected from 2008 to the present in patients with CIEDs undergoing clinically indicated MRI performed under institutional protocol. Cardiac Troponin T (cTnT) levels were drawn both before and 24-36 h after the procedure. The collective data were retrospectively analyzed. MRI exams (n = 512) were performed in 398 patients. Of these, there were 348 unique scans with cTnT recorded before and after MRI (median age 68, IQ 56-78; 62 % men). cTnT did not significantly change for the group as a whole (0.00 +/- 0.056). There were 22 (6.3 %) exams with cTnT change a parts per thousand yen0.002 ng/mL following MRI (range 0.01-0.09 ng/mL). There were no clinically significant events in these patients directly attributable to MR. There were no significant changes in pacing threshold or impedance in the group with elevated cardiac biomarkers. There are very few situations where myocardial injury as detected by cTnT in patients undergoing MRI with CIEDs could be detected. No adverse clinical events or functional changes of the device were noted, even in those with increases in cTnT. Our experience supports that MRI can be performed safely for appropriately selected patients under close clinical observation. Proactive monitoring with the present iteration of cardiac biomarkers appears to be of limited utility, but prospective monitoring with high sensitivity assays may be able to detect subclinical myocardial damage.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 97
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Implantable Devices and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Hsu, Chijen
    Parker, Geoffrey
    Puranik, Rajesh
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2012, 21 (6-7) : 358 - 363
  • [22] Automatic consultation system for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging
    Donghoon Han
    Ji Hyun Lee
    Il-Young Oh
    In-ho Chae
    Ho-Young Lee
    Youngjin Cho
    International Journal of Arrhythmia, 21 (1)
  • [23] Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Safety during Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Hwang, You Mi
    Kim, Jun
    Lee, Ji Hyun
    Kim, Minsu
    Nam, Gi-Byoung
    Choi, Kee-Joon
    Kim, You-Ho
    KOREAN CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2016, 46 (06) : 804 - 810
  • [24] Considerations for stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Chyou, Janice Y.
    Axel, Leon
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (10) : 2136 - 2138
  • [25] Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Are They Truly Still "Enemies"?
    Fogante, Marco
    Volpato, Giovanni
    Pirani, Paolo Esposto
    Cela, Fatjon
    Compagnucci, Paolo
    Valeri, Yari
    Selimi, Adelina
    Alfieri, Michele
    Brugiatelli, Leonardo
    Belleggia, Sara
    Coraducci, Francesca
    Argalia, Giulio
    Casella, Michela
    Dello Russo, Antonio
    Schicchi, Nicolo
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2024, 60 (04):
  • [26] Joint British Society consensus recommendations for magnetic resonance imaging for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Bhuva, Anish
    Charles-Edwards, Geoff
    Ashmore, Jonathan
    Lipton, Alexandra
    Benbow, Matthew
    Grainger, David
    Lobban, Trudie
    Gopalan, Deepa
    Slade, Alistair
    Roditi, Giles
    Manisty, Charlotte
    HEART, 2024, 110 (04)
  • [27] Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Implantable Cardiac Devices
    Sierra, Mark
    Machado, Christian
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2008, 9 (04) : 232 - 238
  • [28] Is diversity harmful?—Mixed-brand cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging
    Christoph Alexander König
    Florian Tinhofer
    Thomas Puntus
    Achim Leo Burger
    Nikolaus Neubauer
    Herbert Langenberger
    Kurt Huber
    Michael Nürnberg
    David Zweiker
    Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2022, 134 : 286 - 293
  • [29] MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CARDIAC IMPLANTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES UNDERGOING MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING - PROPOSAL FOR UNIFIED HOSPITAL PROTOCOL: CROATIAN WORKING GROUP ON ARRHYTHMIAS AND CARDIAC PACING
    Pavlovic, Nikola
    Dula, Kristijan
    Kuharic, Ivan
    Brusich, Sandro
    Velagic, Vedran
    Jurisic, Zrinka
    Bakotic, Zoran
    Anic, Ante
    Nikolic, Borka Pezo
    Radeljic, Vjekoslav
    Cubranic, Zlatko
    Zeljkovic, Ivan
    Zadravec, Dijana
    Manola, Sime
    ACTA CLINICA CROATICA, 2020, 59 (01) : 119 - 125
  • [30] Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Implantable Cardiac Electronic Devices: It's Not What We Can Do, It's What We Should Do
    Roguin, Ariel
    Goldsher, Dorith
    ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2010, 12 (07): : 436 - 438