Instructional practices in reformed undergraduate STEM learning environments: a study of instructor and student behaviors in biology courses

被引:11
作者
Kranzfelder, Petra [1 ]
Lo, Alexander T. [1 ]
Melloy, Marin P. [1 ]
Walker, Lindsey E. [1 ]
Warfa, Abdi-Rizak M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Biol Teaching & Learning, 5-220 Moos Tower,515 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
Undergraduate; active learning; classroom observation protocol; COPUS; active-engagement instruction; evidence-based learning; science teaching; TEACHING PRACTICES; SCIENCE-EDUCATION; CLASSROOM; TECHNOLOGY; ENGAGEMENT; AGREEMENT; IMPACT; WIDE;
D O I
10.1080/09500693.2019.1649503
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Theoretically, organisational culture, instructor training, and learning space design influence how faculty teach STEM courses. Previous studies have used classroom observation protocols to characterise the range of teaching practices in mostly teacher-centered, traditional STEM classrooms. In this study, we examined the classroom behaviour of 13 STEM faculty teaching biology courses in a reformed undergraduate STEM learning environment. Our findings indicate that instructors teaching in this reformed environment guided student learning (58.4 +/- 1.9%) almost three times more than they presented information (20.0 +/- 2.2%). Students worked individually or in groups and talked to the whole class (57.1 +/- 1.8%) 1.5 times more than they received information (35.5 +/- 1.9%). We found significant positive correlation between 'instructor presenting' and 'students receiving' information (r = 0.743, p = 1.4 x 10(-4)) and 'instructor guiding' and 'student working and talking' in class (r = 0.605, p = 7.2 x 10(-5)), suggesting that instructors can change their own classroom behaviours and expect concurrent change in their students' behaviours. Finally, sequencing teaching practices in high active-engagement classrooms showed instructors move and guide student group work and lead whole class discussions before lecturing to students, which could lead to deeper learning of conceptual knowledge. We discuss insights from these findings that have implications for acculturating evidence-based teaching practices in STEM departments.
引用
收藏
页码:1944 / 1961
页数:18
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Akiha K., 2018, Frontiers in Education, V2, DOI [DOI 10.3389/FEDUC.2017.00068, 10.3389/feduc.2017.00068]
  • [2] Changing the Culture of Science Education at Research Universities
    Anderson, W. A.
    Banerjee, U.
    Drennan, C. L.
    Elgin, S. C. R.
    Epstein, I. R.
    Handelsman, J.
    Hatfull, G. F.
    Losick, R.
    O'Dowd, D. K.
    Olivera, B. M.
    Strobel, S. A.
    Walker, G. C.
    Warner, I. M.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2011, 331 (6014) : 152 - 153
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering, P282
  • [4] [Anonymous], CBE LIFE SCI EDUC
  • [5] [Anonymous], INDICATORS MONITORIN, DOI [DOI 10.17226/24943, 10.17226/24943]
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2012, DESCR MEAS UND STEM
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1981, MAINSTREAMING DIGEST
  • [8] Association of American Universities, 2017, PROGR ACH SYST CHANG
  • [9] Baepler P., 2016, A guide to teaching in the active learning classroom: History, research, and practice
  • [10] University learning: Improve undergraduate science education
    Bradforth, Stephen E.
    Miller, Emily R.
    Dichtel, William R.
    Leibovich, Adam K.
    Feig, Andrew L.
    Martin, James D.
    Bjorkman, Karen S.
    Schultz, Zachary D.
    Smith, Tobin L.
    [J]. NATURE, 2015, 523 (7560) : 282 - 284