Relationship between 18FDG-PET and different types of sinonasal malignancies

被引:18
|
作者
Felix-Ravelo, Marylisa [1 ]
Bey, Ayoub [1 ]
Arous, Fabien [2 ]
Paris-Grandpierre, Solene [3 ]
Jankowski, Roger [1 ,2 ]
Duc Trung Nguyen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Nancy, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Nancy, France
[2] Univ Lorraine, Fac Med, Nancy, France
[3] Univ Hosp Nancy, Dept Nucl Med, Nancy, France
关键词
PET/CT scans; standard uptake value; sinonasal malignancy; sinonasal adenocarcinoma; sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma; olfactory neuroblastoma; adenoid cystic carcinoma; sinonasal malignant melanoma; sinonasal neuroendocrine carcinoma; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; SINGLE INSTITUTIONS EXPERIENCE; NECK-CANCER; FDG-PET; HEAD; ESTHESIONEUROBLASTOMA; TUMORS; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1080/00016489.2016.1219917
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Conclusion: The sensitivity and specificity of a (18)FDG-PET scan may be different according to the histology. The SUVmax and SUV ratio may reflect the tumor's aggressive behavior. Objectives: To describe the characteristics of PET/CT scans, including the maximum standard uptake values (SUVmax), at initial diagnosis according to six main types of sinonasal malignancies: sinonasal adenocarcinoma (SNAC), sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC), adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC), sinonasal malignant melanoma (SMM), olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB), and sinonasal neuroendocrine carcinoma (SNEC). Methods: A chart review of 50 patients who were diagnosed and treated for six sinonasal malignancy types over a period of 6 years was conducted. Any F-18-FDG PET/CT scans for each patient were searched using the hospital's intranet. The SUVmax of the primary sinonasal site was recorded. The liver SUVs were utilized as reference SUVs. The SUV ratio was defined as the ratio of the SUVmax of the primary tumor and the SUVliver. Results: The most common malignancy was SNAC (32%), followed by SNUC (24%), ONB (14%), ACC (10%), SMM (10%), and SNEC (10%). The SUVmax and SUV ratio values were significantly different between tumor types (p=0.002 and 0.012, respectively). SNUC had the highest mean SUVmax (14.2), followed by SNAC (9.9). A similar mean SUVmax was observed for SMM, ONB, and ACC (similar to 7.0). SNEC up-takes the least (18)FDG among these six tumor types (mean SUVmax=4.7).
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 195
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Current clinical use of 18FDG-PET/CT in patients with thoracic and systemic sarcoidosis
    Rubini, Giuseppe
    Cappabianca, Salvatore
    Altini, Corinna
    Notaristefano, Antonio
    Fanelli, Margherita
    Ianora, Amato Antonio Stabile
    Asabella, Artor Niccoli
    Rotondo, Antonio
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2014, 119 (01): : 64 - 74
  • [32] Imaging features of 18F-FDG PET/CT in different types of systemic vasculitis
    Chen, Zhuo
    Zhao, Yunyun
    Wang, Qian
    Li, Yuan
    Li, Hebei
    Zhou, Yunshan
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 41 (05) : 1499 - 1509
  • [33] 18FDG PET/CT in Routine Surveillance of Asymptomatic Patients following Treatment of Sinonasal Neoplasms
    Workman, Alan D.
    Glicksman, Jordan T.
    Parasher, Arjun K.
    Carey, Ryan M.
    Brooks, Steven G.
    Kennedy, David W.
    Nabavizadeh, Seyed A.
    Learned, Kim O.
    Palmer, James N.
    Adappa, Nithin D.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2017, 157 (06) : 1068 - 1074
  • [34] Cryptorchidism as a potential source of misinterpretation in 18FDG-PET imaging in restaging lymphoma patients
    Groheux, David
    Teyton, Pierre
    Vercellino, Laetitia
    Ferretti, Alice
    Rubello, Domenico
    Hindie, Elif
    BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2013, 67 (06) : 533 - 538
  • [35] Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Lung Oligometastases: Predictive Parameters of Early Response by 18FDG-PET/CT
    Mazzola, Rosario
    Fiorentino, Alba
    Di Paola, Gioacchino
    Levra, Niccolo Giaj
    Ricchetti, Francesco
    Fersino, Sergio
    Tebano, Umberto
    Pasetto, Stefano
    Ruggieri, Ruggero
    Salgarello, Matteo
    Alongi, Filippo
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 12 (03) : 547 - 555
  • [36] Method to correlate 1H MRSI and 18FDG-PET
    O'Neill, J
    Eberling, IL
    Schuff, N
    Jagust, W
    Reed, B
    Soto, G
    Ezekiel, F
    Klein, G
    Weiner, MW
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2000, 43 (02) : 244 - 250
  • [37] 18FDG-PET/CT Specificity for the Detection of Lymphoma Recurrence in the Tonsils
    West, Jonathan D.
    Kim, Mary E.
    Lapalma, Dorian M.
    Vergara-Lluri, Maria
    Conti, Peter
    Chambers, Tamara N.
    Swanson, Mark S.
    OTO OPEN, 2021, 5 (04)
  • [38] Dual time point 18FDG-PET/CT versus single time point 18FDG-PET/CT for the differential diagnosis of pulmonary nodules: a meta-analysis
    Zhang, Li
    Wang, Yinzhong
    Lei, Junqiang
    Tian, Jinhui
    Zhai, Yanan
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2013, 54 (07) : 770 - 777
  • [39] 18F-FDG-PET/CT Imaging in Patients with Febrile Neutropenia and Haematological Malignancies
    Camus, Vincent
    Edet-Sanson, Agathe
    Bubenheim, Michael
    Hitzel, Anne
    Becker, Stephanie
    David, Marion
    Stamatoullas, Aspasia
    Lenain, Pascal
    Jardin, Fabrice
    Contentin, Nathalie
    Fontoura, Marie Laure
    Cardinael, Nathalie
    Vaudaux, Sandrine
    Dubois, Sydney
    Tilly, Herve
    Vera, Pierre
    Lepretre, Stephane
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 35 (05) : 2999 - 3005
  • [40] Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT Differentiating Olfactory Neuroblastoma From Sinonasal Undifferentiated Carcinoma
    Elkhatib, Ahmad H.
    Soldatova, Liuba
    Carrau, Ricardo L.
    Hachem, Ralph Abi
    Ditzel, Leo
    Campbell, Raewyn
    Prevedello, Daniel M.
    Prevedello, Luciano
    Ditzel Filho, Leo F. S.
    Campbell, Raewyn G.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2017, 127 (02) : 321 - 324