Longitudinal data analysis using Bayesian-frequentist hybrid random effects model

被引:1
作者
Chen, Le [1 ]
Yuan, Ao [2 ]
Liu, Aiyi [1 ]
Chen, Guanjie [3 ]
机构
[1] Eunice Kennedy Shriver Natl Inst Child Hlth & Hum, BBB, DIPHR, NIH, Bethesda, MD USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Dept Biostat Bioinformat & Biomath, Washington, DC USA
[3] NHGRI, Ctr Res Genom & Global Hlth, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
hybrid; longitudinal data; simulation;
D O I
10.1080/02664763.2014.898137
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
The mixed random effect model is commonly used in longitudinal data analysis within either frequentist or Bayesian framework. Here we consider a case, in which we have prior knowledge on partial parameters, while no such information on the rest of the parameters. Thus, we use the hybrid approach on the random-effects model with partial parameters. The parameters are estimated via Bayesian procedure, and the rest of parameters by the frequentist maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), simultaneously on the same model. In practice, we often know partial prior information such as, covariates of age, gender, etc. These information can be used, and accurate estimations in mixed random-effects model can be obtained. A series of simulation studies were performed to compare the results with the commonly used random-effects model with and without partial prior information. The results in hybrid estimation (HYB) and MLE were very close to each other. The estimated values in with partial prior information model (HYB) were more closer to true values, and showed less variances than without partial prior information in MLE. To compare with true values, the mean square of errors are much less in HYB than in MLE. This advantage of HYB is very obvious in longitudinal data with a small sample size. The methods of HYB and MLE are applied to a real longitudinal data for illustration purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:2001 / 2010
页数:10
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   The interplay of Bayesian and frequentist analysis [J].
Bayarri, MJ ;
Berger, JO .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 19 (01) :58-80
[2]  
Fitzmaurice G, 2009, CH CRC HANDB MOD STA, P1
[3]   THE BAYES NONBAYES COMPROMISE - A BRIEF REVIEW [J].
GOOD, IJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 87 (419) :597-606
[4]   Comparing Bayesian and Frequentist Approaches for Multiple Outcome Mixed Treatment Comparisons [J].
Hong, Hwanhee ;
Carlin, Bradley P. ;
Shamliyan, Tatyana A. ;
Wyman, Jean F. ;
Ramakrishnan, Rema ;
Sainfort, Francois ;
Kane, Robert L. .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2013, 33 (05) :702-714
[5]  
Ibrahim JG, 2000, STAT SCI, V15, P46
[6]  
Kaplan D.W, 2004, SAGE HDB QUANTITATIV, V1st
[7]  
Larid M. N., 1982, BIOMETRICS, V38, P963
[8]  
Yuan A., 2014, ANAL CASE C IN PRESS
[9]   Bayesian-frequentist hybrid model with application to the analysis of gene copy number changes [J].
Yuan, Ao ;
Chen, Guanjie ;
Xiong, Juan ;
He, Wenqing ;
Jin, Wen ;
Rotimi, Charles .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2011, 38 (05) :987-1005
[10]  
Yuan Ao, 2009, Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, V7, P175, DOI 10.1142/S0219720009004059