Attentional Retraining Administered in the Field Reduces Smokers' Attentional Bias and Craving

被引:49
作者
Kerst, William F. [1 ]
Waters, Andrew J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Med & Clin Psychol, Bethesda, MD 20184 USA
关键词
attentional retraining; attentional bias; craving; tobacco; CUE-REACTIVITY; SMOKING CUES; RELEVANT; BEHAVIOR; IMPACT; TASK;
D O I
10.1037/a0035708
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: Attentional retraining (AR) is a potential new treatment for addiction. AR trains addicts to attend away from drug-related cues, thereby reducing exposure to drug cues and reducing craving. We examined the utility of delivering AR to smokers on a personal digital assistant (PDA) in the natural environment. Method: Smokers (N = 60) not seeking to quit were randomly assigned to an AR group or a control group (i.e., a group with no training). They carried a PDA with them for one week. They were prompted to complete four assessments daily, including three attentional retrainings (AR group) or three control trainings (control group), and one evaluation of attentional bias. AR was implemented using a modified visual probe task. Attentional bias was assessed using a standard visual probe task on the PDA. Results: The AR group completed an average of 15.0 attentional retrainings and the control group completed an average of 14.9 control trainings. As hypothesized, attentional bias declined over the week in the AR group, but not in the control group, Group x Day interaction, F(1, 232) = 4.77, p = .03. AR also reduced craving ratings following a briefly presented picture containing smoking and nonsmoking features, group main effect, F(1, 234) = 3.89, p = .04. AR did not significantly influence smoking behavior. Conclusion: AR can be administered on a mobile device in the natural environment, and AR can reduce attentional bias and craving.
引用
收藏
页码:1232 / 1240
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [21] Clinical effectiveness of attentional bias modification training in abstinent alcoholic patients
    Schoenmakers, Tim M.
    de Bruin, Marijn
    Lux, Irja F. M.
    Goertz, Alexa G.
    Van Kerkhof, Dorieke H. A. T.
    Wiers, Reinout W.
    [J]. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2010, 109 (1-3) : 30 - 36
  • [22] Shiffman S, 2009, ADDICTION, V104, P1617, DOI 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02580.x
  • [23] SRNT Subcommittee on Biochemical Verification, 2002, Nicotine Tob Res, V4, P149, DOI 10.1080/14622200210123581
  • [24] Using the Implicit Association Test to investigate attitude-behaviour consistency for stigmatised behaviour
    Swanson, JE
    Rudman, LA
    Greenwald, AG
    [J]. COGNITION & EMOTION, 2001, 15 (02) : 207 - 230
  • [25] A COGNITIVE MODEL OF DRUG URGES AND DRUG-USE BEHAVIOR - ROLE OF AUTOMATIC AND NONAUTOMATIC PROCESSES
    TIFFANY, ST
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1990, 97 (02) : 147 - 168
  • [26] Attentional bias predicts outcome in smoking cessation
    Waters, AJ
    Shiffman, S
    Sayette, MA
    Paty, JA
    Gwaltney, CJ
    Balabanis, MH
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 22 (04) : 378 - 387
  • [27] Evaluating the utility of administering a reaction time task in an ecological momentary assessment study
    Waters, Andrew J.
    Li, Yisheng
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 197 (01) : 25 - 35
  • [28] Wiers R.W., 2006, HDB IMPLICIT COGNITI
  • [29] Statistical methods in psychology journals -: Guidelines and explanations
    Wilkinson, L
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1999, 54 (08) : 594 - 604
  • [30] Cue-Reactivity in the Natural Environment of Cigarette Smokers: The Impact of Photographic and In Vivo Smoking Stimuli
    Wray, Jennifer M.
    Godleski, Stephanie A.
    Tiffany, Stephen T.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY OF ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2011, 25 (04) : 733 - 737