Affective syndromes and their screening in cancer patients with early and stable disease: Italian ICD-10 data and performance of the Distress Thermometer from the Southern European Psycho-Oncology Study (SEPOS)

被引:70
作者
Grassi, Luigi [1 ]
Sabato, Silvana
Rossi, Elena
Marmai, Luciana
Biancosino, Bruno
机构
[1] Univ Ferrara, Sect Psychiat, Dept Med & Surg Sci Commun & Behav, I-44100 Ferrara, Italy
关键词
ICD-10 psychiatric morbidity; Distress; Thermometer; Screening; Cancer; CONSULTATION-LIAISON PSYCHIATRY; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS; PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH; DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; DEPRESSION; MORBIDITY; COMMUNICATION; RELIABILITY; PHYSICIANS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2008.07.016
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The assessment of mood and anxiety disorders secondary to cancer by using easy-to-administer instruments has been the object of recent research. Methods: The aim of this study was to examine the accuracy of the short screening tool developed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines For Distress Management, (0-10 point-scale Distress Thermometer) (DT) in detecting affective syndrome disorders in Italian cancer patients. The sample consisted of 109 cancer outpatients who were administered the ICD-10 psychiatric interview (CIDI), the DT and the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS). Results: Forty-four patients (40.40%) met the criteria for an ICD-10 diagnosis of affective syndromes. The DT was significantly associated with HADS-Total score (r = 0.66, p = 0.001). A cut-off >= 4 on the DT showed a sensitivity of 79.5% and a specificity of 75.4% (positive predictive value PPV = 68.6%; negative predictive value - NPV - 84.5%). The cut-off score >= 10 on the HADS was associated with a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 81.5% (PPV -76%; NPV-89.9%). A cut-off score >= 5 on DT and >= 15 oil HADS maximized sensitivity (78.6% and 95%, respectively) and specificity (83.1% and 96%, respectively) for patients with more severe affective syndromes (major depression, persistent depressive disorders). Conclusions: The results Suggest that simple instruments call be used as feasible tools in the screening of mood and anxiety disorders among cancer patients. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 199
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], NCCN CLIN PRACT GUID
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, COMP INT DIAGN INT
[3]   Cancer distress screening - Needs, models, and methods [J].
Carlson, LE ;
Bultz, BD .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2003, 55 (05) :403-409
[4]  
Chochinov HM, 1997, AM J PSYCHIAT, V154, P674
[5]   Detecting psychological distress in cancer patients: validity of the Italian version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [J].
Costantini, M ;
Musso, M ;
Viterbori, P ;
Bonci, F ;
Del Mastro, L ;
Garrone, O ;
Venturini, M ;
Morasso, G .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 1999, 7 (03) :121-127
[6]   Psychiatric morbidity and its recognition by doctors in patients with cancer [J].
Fallowfield, L ;
Ratcliffe, D ;
Jenkins, V ;
Saul, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 84 (08) :1011-1015
[7]   Interrater reliability, prevalence, and relation to, ICD-10 diagnoses of the diagnostic criteria for psychosomatic research in consultation-liaison psychiatry patients [J].
Galeazzi, GM ;
Ferrari, S ;
MacKinnon, A ;
Rigatelli, M .
PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2004, 45 (05) :386-393
[8]  
GESSLER S, 2007, PSYCHO-ONCOL, V31, P538
[9]   Psychosocial morbidity and its correlates in cancer patients of the Mediterranean area: findings from the Southern European Psycho-Oncology Study [J].
Grassi, L ;
Travado, L ;
Moncayo, FLG ;
Sabato, S ;
Rossi, E .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2004, 83 (2-3) :243-248
[10]   A communication intervention for training Southern European oncologists to recognize psychosocial morbidity in cancer. I - Development of the model and preliminary results on physicians' satisfaction [J].
Grassi, L ;
Travado, L ;
Gil, F ;
Campos, R ;
Lluch, P ;
Baile, W .
JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2005, 20 (02) :79-84