Effects of alternative communication on the communicative effectiveness of an individual with a progressive language disorder

被引:17
作者
Pattee, Cynthia
Von Berg, Shelley [1 ]
Ghezzi, Patrick
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Sch Med, Dept Speech Pathol & Audiol, Reno, NV 89557 USA
[2] Univ Nevada, Dept Psychol, Reno, NV 89557 USA
关键词
American sign language; apraxia of speech; augmentative communication; primary progressive aphasia;
D O I
10.1097/01.mrr.0000210046.02044.4d
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
This study was designed to investigate the effects of two different modes of communication on the communicative output of an individual who is no longer able to communicate verbally, presenting with a primary progressive aphasia and apraxia of speech. The two treatment approaches included training the patient with a text-to-speech alternative communication device and with American sign language. An alternating treatment design was used to compare two communicative approaches (an alternative communication device and American sign language) on the subject's communicative effectiveness. Communicative effectiveness was measured in terms of number of words, correct information units and percentage correct information units, using a protocol that was adapted to quantify the output generated by the alternative communication device and American sign language. Increases across all three measures resulted for both the alternative communication device and American sign language. The clinical implications are explored, and the results add to existing studies regarding treatment possibilities using alternative communication for individuals who present with a progressive speech and language disorder, without concomitant cognitive deficits.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 153
页数:3
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Baines K. A., 1999, Assessment of language-related functional activities
[2]   SIGN ACQUISITION IN 2 APHASIC SUBJECTS WITH LIMB APRAXIA [J].
COELHO, CA ;
DUFFY, RJ .
APHASIOLOGY, 1990, 4 (01) :1-8
[3]  
Cress C., 1999, Augmentative and Alternative Communication, V15, P248, DOI [DOI 10.1080/07434619912331278785, https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619912331278785]
[4]  
DOWDEN PA, 1981, P CLIN APH C MINN BR, P131
[5]  
Lasker JP, 2001, AUGMENTATIVE ALTERNA, V17, P141, DOI [DOI 10.1080/AAC.17.3.141.153, 10.1080/aac.17.3.141.153.]
[6]  
MCNEIL MR, 2001, LANGUAGE INTERVENTIO, P472
[7]  
McReynolds L.V., 1983, Single-subject experimental designs in communicative disorders
[8]  
Murphy J, 1996, EUR J DISORDER COMM, V31, P31
[9]   Longitudinal treatment of primary progressive aphasia: a case study [J].
Murray, LL .
APHASIOLOGY, 1998, 12 (7-8) :651-672
[10]   A SYSTEM FOR QUANTIFYING THE INFORMATIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY OF THE CONNECTED SPEECH OF ADULTS WITH APHASIA [J].
NICHOLAS, LE ;
BROOKSHIRE, RH .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1993, 36 (02) :338-350