Common causes of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a single-centre analysis of four hundred and seventy one cases

被引:38
作者
Citak, Mustafa [1 ]
Dersch, Kathrin [1 ]
Kamath, Atul F. [2 ]
Haasper, Carl [1 ]
Gehrke, Thorsten [1 ]
Kendoff, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Helios Endo Kin Hamburg, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; Unicondylar knee arthroplasty; Failure; Aseptic loosening; Outcome; FOLLOW-UP; COMPUTER NAVIGATION; REPLACEMENT; MULTICENTER; REVISION; SURVIVORSHIP; IMPLANTATION; EXPERIENCE; SURVIVAL; MINIMUM;
D O I
10.1007/s00264-013-2263-0
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose We performed this retrospective study to determine the main causes for early and late failures of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Methods Between January 2000 and March 2012, all patients treated for a failed medial UKA in the authors' institution were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 471 patients were identified, and causes of failure were analysed based on the medical records and radiographs at the time of revision. Results The cohort included 161 males and 310 females, with a mean age of 67.7 years (range, 42-91 years; SD = 10.1) at the time of revision. The mean time from index arthroplasty to revision surgery was 6.1 years (range, 0.1-27.9 years; SD = 5.6). A total of 254 cases (53.9 %) failed within five years after primary implantation, and 108 cases (22.9 %) failed after ten years. The major reason for failure was the development of other compartment arthritis (39.5 %), followed by aseptic loosening (25.4 %). Conclusion Of importance, the mean time to failure after UKA was 6.1 years, with more than 50 % of failures occurring within the first five years postoperatively.
引用
收藏
页码:961 / 965
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Center and Surgeon Volume Influence the Revision Rate Following Unicondylar Knee Replacement [J].
Baker, Paul ;
Jameson, Simon ;
Critchley, Rebecca ;
Reed, Mike ;
Gregg, Paul ;
Deehan, David .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2013, 95A (08) :702-709
[2]  
Berend Keith R, 2007, Surg Technol Int, V16, P193
[3]  
Berger RA, 1999, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P50
[4]   Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up [J].
Berger, RA ;
Meneghini, RM ;
Jacobs, JJ ;
Sheinkop, MB ;
Della Valle, CJ ;
Rosenberg, AG ;
Galante, JO .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (05) :999-1006
[5]  
Buckup K, 2007, ORTHOPEDICS, V30, P66
[6]   Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery - 10-year minimum follow-up period [J].
Cartier, P ;
Sanouiller, JL ;
Grelsamer, RP .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1996, 11 (07) :782-788
[7]   Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty modes of failure: Wear is not the main reason for failure: A multicentre study of 418 failed knees [J].
Epinette, J. -A. ;
Brunschweiler, B. ;
Mertl, P. ;
Mole, D. ;
Cazenave, A. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2012, 98 (06) :S124-S130
[8]  
EWALD FC, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P9
[9]   Long-term Survivorship and Failure Modes of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty [J].
Foran, Jared R. H. ;
Brown, Nicholas M. ;
Della Valle, Craig J. ;
Berger, Richard A. ;
Galante, Jorge O. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 471 (01) :102-108
[10]   Patellar impingement following unicompartmental arthroplasty [J].
Hernigou, P ;
Deschamps, G .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (07) :1132-1137