The effect of silane on the bond strengths of fiber posts

被引:126
作者
Perdigao, Jorge
Gomes, George
Lee, Ignatius K.
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Restorat Sci, Div Operat Dent, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Granada, Sch Dent, Dept Dent Mat, Granada, Spain
关键词
dental bonding; fiber post; post-and-core technique;
D O I
10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.002
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives. Esthetic posts have been developed to maximize the foundation of esthetic restorations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of silane on the bond strength of three fiber-reinforced resin posts (fiber posts). Methods. Fifty-four extracted human maxillary central incisors and canines were endodontically treated. D.T. Light Post (DT, Bisco), FRC Postec (FR, Ivoclar Vivadent), and ParaPost Fiber White (PP, Coltene/Whaledent) were inserted using the resin adhesive system provided by the respective manufacturer. For half of the specimens in each group, the fiber posts were treated with a silane solution (Monobond S, Ivoclar Vivadent). A push-out test was performed on three different sections of each root to measure bond strengths. Data were analyzed with ANOVA and Bonferroni's post hoc test at P < 0.05. Results. The use of silane did not result in any statistically significant difference at any level of the root. Silane did not result in any significant different bond strengths (MPa) for each of the posts. When the data were pooled, the use of silane did not result in statistically significant different bond strengths at P > 0.403: No silane = 12.7 +/- 8.4; Silane = 14.1 +/- 7.0. The coronal third of the root (17.5 +/- 6.7) resulted in statistically greater bond strengths than the medium third (12.9 +/- 6.8) and than the apical third (9.8 +/- 7.3) at P < 0.002 and P < 0.0001, respectively. The medium third and the apical third resulted in no statistically significant different bond strengths from each other at P > 0.07. The type of post did not result in statistically significant different bond strengths at P > 0.417: DT = 14.7 +/- 6.8 MPa; FR = 13.3 +/- 6.6 MPa; PP = 12.2 +/- 6.6 MPa. Significance. The use of a silane coupling agent did not increase the push-out bond strengths of the three fiber posts used in this study. All posts bonded to root dentin at the same magnitude. Bonding is more predictable at the most coronal level of the root. (C) 2005 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:752 / 758
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems [J].
Akkayan, B ;
Gülmez, T .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2002, 87 (04) :431-437
[2]   Microtensile bond strength of a dual-cure resin core material to glass and quartz fibre posts [J].
Aksornmuang, J ;
Foxton, RM ;
Nakajima, M ;
Tagami, J .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2004, 32 (06) :443-450
[3]   Stress analysis of an upper central incisor restored with different posts [J].
Albuquerque, RD ;
Polleto, LTD ;
Fontana, RHBTS ;
Cimini, CA .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2003, 30 (09) :936-943
[4]   Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts [J].
Asmussen, E ;
Peutzfeldt, A ;
Heitmann, T .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1999, 27 (04) :275-278
[5]   Coronal leakage of mixed anaerobic bacteria after obturation and post space preparation [J].
Barrieshi, KM ;
Walton, RE ;
Johnson, WT ;
Drake, DR .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1997, 84 (03) :310-314
[6]  
Bin Hsu Y, 2002, INT J PROSTHODONT, V15, P175
[7]   Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin [J].
Bouillaguet, S ;
Troesch, S ;
Wataha, JC ;
Krejci, I ;
Meyer, JM ;
Pashley, DH .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2003, 19 (03) :199-205
[8]   A SCANNING ELECTRON-MICROSCOPIC EVALUATION OF HUMAN DENTINAL TUBULES ACCORDING TO AGE AND LOCATION [J].
CARRIGAN, PJ ;
MORSE, DR ;
FURST, ML ;
SINAI, IH .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1984, 10 (08) :359-363
[9]  
Chai J, 2004, INT J PROSTHODONT, V17, P195
[10]   DENTINAL TUBULE ANASTOMOSIS - A POTENTIAL FACTOR IN ADHESIVE BONDING [J].
CHAPPELL, RP ;
COBB, CM ;
SPENCER, P ;
EICK, JD .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1994, 72 (02) :183-188