Modular tapered conical revision stem in hip revision surgery: mid- term results

被引:20
作者
Perticarini, Loris [1 ]
Rossi, Stefano Marco Paolo [1 ]
Fioruzzi, Alberto [2 ]
Jannelli, Eugenio [3 ]
Mosconi, Mario [3 ,4 ]
Benazzo, Francesco [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UO Ortoped & Traumatol Fdn Poliambulan, Sez Chirurg Protes & Indirizzo Robot, Unita Traumatol Sport, Via Bissolati 57, I-25124 Brescia, Italy
[2] IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Dipartimento Anca & Traumatol, Milan, Italy
[3] Fdn IRCCS Policlin San Matteo, Clin Ortoped & Traumatol, Ple Golgi 19, Pavia, Italy
[4] Univ Pavia, Pavia, Italy
关键词
Conical revision stem; Femoral bone defects; Hip revision surgery; Modularity; Periprosthetic femoral fracture;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-020-03886-y
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe aim of this paper is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a fluted tapered modular distal-fixation stem at medium to long-term follow-up. The hypothesis of this investigation was to verify if the use of this implant design may have provided potential advantages in femoral revisions and post-traumatic instances where the restoration of the anatomy was the prime concern.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 62 cases of femoral revision surgeries, performed in Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB bone defects between January 2001 and December 2011 with a mean follow-up of 8.51.5years (range 5.1-15.9years) where a modular fluted stem was used. The clinical assessment was performed with the Harris Hip Score (HHS), and the radiographic evaluation was carried in order to assess the stability of the femoral component. Intra-operative and postoperative complications were recorded, and the rates of complications and revisions for any cause were determined.ResultsMean HHS improved 35.4 points from the preoperative assessment. Radiographic evaluation showed a stable stem anchorage in 90.3% of the cases at the last follow-up. Five (8%) implants required additional surgery. Neither breakage of the stem nor loosening of the taper junction were recorded. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 89.4% (CI: 88.8-90%) for any complication and 92.3% (CI: 91.8-92.7%) according to revision for any causes at 81months follow-up.Conclusions Our findings suggest that this stem design is a reliable option in cases of complex femoral bone defects, as well as in cases with high functional deficiencies, with promising survivorship.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Dislocationm after revision total hip arthroplasty - An analysis of risk factors and treatment options [J].
Alberton, GM ;
High, WA ;
Morrey, BF .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (10) :1788-1792
[2]   The Epidemiology of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United States [J].
Bozic, Kevin J. ;
Kurtz, Steven M. ;
Lau, Edmund ;
Ong, Kevin ;
Vail, Thomas P. ;
Berry, Daniel J. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A (01) :128-133
[3]   ECTOPIC OSSIFICATION FOLLOWING TOTAL HIP-REPLACEMENT - INCIDENCE AND A METHOD OF CLASSIFICATION [J].
BROOKER, AF ;
BOWERMAN, JW ;
ROBINSON, RA ;
RILEY, LH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1973, A 55 (08) :1629-1632
[4]   Is There a Benefit to Modularity for Femoral Revisions When Using a Splined, Tapered Titanium Stem? [J].
Cohn, Matthew R. ;
Tetreault, Matthew W. ;
Li, Jefferson ;
Kunze, Kyle N. ;
Nahhas, Cindy R. ;
Michalski, Joseph E. ;
Levine, Brett R. ;
Nam, Denis .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (06) :S278-S283
[5]  
Crowninshield RD, 2004, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P176
[6]  
Della Valle CJ, 2004, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P55
[7]  
ENGH CA, 1990, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P107
[8]   Improved outcome in femoral revision arthroplasty with tapered fluted modular titanium stems [J].
Garbuz, Donald S. ;
Toms, Andrew ;
Masri, Bassam A. ;
Duncan, Clive P. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2006, (453) :199-202
[10]   Classifications In Brief: The Paprosky Classification of Femoral Bone Loss [J].
Ibrahim, David A. ;
Fernando, Navin D. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 475 (03) :917-921