Structural Relationships among Destination Preference, Satisfaction and Loyalty in Chinese Tourists to Australia

被引:35
作者
Mao, Iris Yue [1 ]
Zhang, Hanqin Qiu [2 ]
机构
[1] Edith Cowan Univ, Fac Business & Law, Sch Mkt Tourism & Leisure, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Sch Hotel & Tourism Management, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
destination loyalty; destination preference; Chinese tourists; destination satisfaction; Australia; structural equation modeling; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1002/jtr.1919
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study quantifies the relationship among destination preference, destination satisfaction and destination loyalty. Destination loyalty consists of two dimensions: word-of-mouth (WOM) and destination attachment (DA). It is found that WOM is directly affected by destination satisfaction, whereas DA is predetermined by the destination preference of tourists before a visit. Thus, the destination experience is the crucial factor in the spread of positive WOM about a destination. Nevertheless, to develop tourists' DA, effective loyalty schemes should be implemented through marketing efforts before they visit a destination. The findings of this study can be used by destinations to analyze and evaluate their loyalty-building process and marketing strategy. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 208
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[22]  
Park C.W., 2007, SEOUL NATL J, V12, P3, DOI [10.1509/jmkg.74.6.1, DOI 10.4337/9781848446151.00007]
[23]  
Rittichainuwat B. N., 2002, Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, V12, P19, DOI 10.1300/J073v12n02_03
[24]  
Wood T., 1993, RESTAURANTS US, V13, P16
[25]  
Woodside A. G., 1989, Journal of Travel Research, V27, P8, DOI 10.1177/004728758902700402
[26]   An examination of the effects of motivation and satisfaction on destination loyalty: a structural model [J].
Yoon, Y ;
Uysal, M .
TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2005, 26 (01) :45-56
[27]   The behavioral consequences of service quality [J].
Zeithaml, VA ;
Berry, LL ;
Parasuraman, A .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1996, 60 (02) :31-46