Bibliometric analysis for process capability research

被引:22
作者
Ahmad, Shafiq [1 ]
Alatefi, Moath [1 ]
Alkahtani, Mohammad [1 ]
Anwar, Saqib [1 ]
Sharaf, Mohamed [1 ]
Abdollahian, Mali [2 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] RMIT Univ, Coll Sci Engn & Hlth, Sch Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
QUALITY TECHNOLOGY AND QUANTITATIVE MANAGEMENT | 2019年 / 16卷 / 04期
关键词
Process capability (PC) research; process capability indices (PCIs); bibliometric indicators; influential authors; influential research organizations; influential countries; CITATION ANALYSIS; IMPACT; PRODUCTIVITY; 21ST-CENTURY; ECONOMICS; JOURNALS;
D O I
10.1080/16843703.2018.1464426
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Bibliometric research focuses on the analysis of the bibliographic indicators quantitatively. It is a useful way for classifying information according to different variables, including journals, institutions and countries. This paper presents a general overview of research conducted in the field of process capability using bibliometric indicators. The main advantage of the current study is that the bibliometric indicators provide a broad picture and identify some of the most influential research conducted in the area of process capability. The analysis is divided into key sections focused on relevant journals, research papers, authors, institutions and countries. Web of Science (WOS) databases is the source of data for carrying out this bibliometric analysis. The study reveals that W.L. Pearn and C.W. Wu. are the two most influential authors in process capability research. On the other hand, Journal of Quality Technology, and Quality and Reliability Engineering International are the two most influential journals for publishing process capability researches. Furthermore, Taiwan is found to be the most influential country, followed by the U.S.A. in the process capability research.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 477
页数:19
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Ahmad S., 2009, MULTIVARIATE PROCESS
[2]   h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields [J].
Alonso, S. ;
Cabrerizo, F. J. ;
Herrera-Viedma, E. ;
Herrera, F. .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2009, 3 (04) :273-289
[3]  
Ashraf M.A., 2009, INT J ADV MANUF TECH, V41, P11
[4]   Worldwide econometrics rankings: 1989-2005 [J].
Baltagi, Badi H. .
ECONOMETRIC THEORY, 2007, 23 (05) :952-1012
[5]   Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century - A review [J].
Bar-Ilan, Judit .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2008, 2 (01) :1-52
[6]   A NEW MEASURE OF PROCESS CAPABILITY - CPM [J].
CHAN, LK ;
CHENG, SW ;
SPIRING, FA .
JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 1988, 20 (03) :162-175
[7]   Citation analysis and bibliometric approach for ant colony optimization from 1996 to 2010 [J].
Deng, Guang-Feng ;
Lin, Woo-Tsong .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (06) :6229-6237
[8]   Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base [J].
Fagerberg, Jan ;
Fosaas, Morten ;
Sapprasert, Koson .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2012, 41 (07) :1132-1153
[9]   The history and meaning of the journal impact factor [J].
Garfield, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (01) :90-93
[10]   Worldwide research output in probability and statistics: an update [J].
Genest, C ;
Guay, M .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS-REVUE CANADIENNE DE STATISTIQUE, 2002, 30 (02) :329-342