Differentiating between the supply of N to wheat from above and belowground residues of preceding crops of pea and canola

被引:36
作者
Arcand, Melissa M. [1 ]
Knight, J. Diane [1 ]
Farrell, Richard E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Soil Sci, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Crop residues; Belowground N; Rotation; Brassica napus; Pisum sativum; Triticum aestivum; NITROGEN ROTATION BENEFITS; GRAIN LEGUMES; FERTILIZER NITROGEN; MICROBIAL BIOMASS; FIELD PEA; SOIL; MINERALIZATION; DECOMPOSITION; RHIZODEPOSITION; TURNOVER;
D O I
10.1007/s00374-013-0877-4
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Belowground N comprises an important component of total residue N, but the N from this pool is often not included in studies that use N-15 approaches to trace residue-derived N in succeeding crops. The objective of this greenhouse study was to differentiate between N supplied from aboveground and belowground crop residues, including rhizodeposits, of pea and canola to wheat using N-15 labeling. A cross N-15-labeling approach was used in which wheat was grown on N-15-labeled belowground residues and non-labeled aboveground residues and vice versa. On average, the amount of N in wheat derived from belowground residues was almost twice the amount from aboveground residues. The higher input of both aboveground and belowground residue biomass and hence residue N from canola compared to pea tended to increase the residue-derived N in wheat from canola (6.4 %) relative to pea (4.7 %). However, differences in the percent recovery of N-15 based on the amount of residue-N-15 initially applied revealed that a higher proportion of belowground residue N from pea (13.4 %) was recovered in wheat compared to the corresponding aboveground residue N from pea (8.8 %), and both belowground and aboveground residue N from canola (6.5 and 7.3 %, respectively). The total supply of N to wheat from preceding pea and canola crops was relatively low, likely due to wide C/N ratios. This study demonstrates the importance of belowground residue N to the supply of N to succeeding crops as well as differences between species.
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 570
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Mineralisation of C and N from root, stem and leaf residues in soil and role of their biochemical quality [J].
Abiven, S ;
Recous, S ;
Reyes, V ;
Oliver, R .
BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 2005, 42 (02) :119-128
[2]   Estimating belowground nitrogen inputs of pea and canola and their contribution to soil inorganic N pools using 15N labeling [J].
Arcand, Melissa M. ;
Knight, J. Diane ;
Farrell, Richard E. .
PLANT AND SOIL, 2013, 371 (1-2) :67-80
[3]  
Ayers KW, 1985, U SASKATCHEWAN EXTEN, V48
[4]  
Ayers KW, 1985, SASKATCHEWAN I PEDOL, V86
[5]   Nitrogen contribution of field pea in annual cropping systems .2. Total nitrogen benefit [J].
Beckie, HJ ;
Brandt, SA ;
Schoenau, JJ ;
Campbell, CA ;
Henry, JL ;
Janzen, HH .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1997, 77 (03) :323-331
[6]   PLANT-AVAILABLE NITROGEN FROM LENTIL AND WHEAT RESIDUES DURING A SUBSEQUENT GROWING-SEASON [J].
BREMER, E ;
VANKESSEL, C .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1992, 56 (04) :1155-1160
[7]   Carbon, Nitrogen, and Greenhouse Gas Balances in an 18-Year Cropping System Study on the Northern Great Plains [J].
Bremer, E. ;
Janzen, H. H. ;
Ellert, B. H. ;
McKenzie, R. H. .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2011, 75 (04) :1493-1502
[8]   SEASONAL MICROBIAL BIOMASS DYNAMICS AFTER ADDITION OF LENTIL AND WHEAT RESIDUES [J].
BREMER, E ;
VANKESSEL, C .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1992, 56 (04) :1141-1146
[9]   15N isotopic crop residue cycling studies and modeling suggest that IPCC methodologies to assess residue contributions to N2O-N emissions should be reevaluated [J].
Delgado, Jorge A. ;
Del Grosso, Stephen J. ;
Ogle, Stephen M. .
NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2010, 86 (03) :383-390
[10]   Carbon input to soil from oilseed and pulse crops on the Canadian prairies [J].
Gan, Y. T. ;
Campbell, C. A. ;
Janzen, H. H. ;
Lemke, R. L. ;
Basnyat, P. ;
McDonald, C. L. .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 132 (3-4) :290-297