Determinants of Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy Outcomes

被引:20
作者
Hu, Jim C. [1 ]
Liu, Chia-Hung [1 ]
Treat, Eric G. [1 ]
Ernest, Alexander [2 ]
Veale, Jeffrey [1 ]
Carter, Stacey [1 ]
Huang, Kuo-How [1 ]
Blumberg, Jeremy M. [1 ]
Schulam, Peter G. [3 ]
Gritsch, Hans A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Tripler Army Med Ctr, Honolulu, HI 96859 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
Donor nephrectomy; Laparoscopy; Complication; Outcomes; MULTIPLE RENAL-ARTERIES; LIVING KIDNEY DONORS; LIVE DONOR; URETERAL COMPLICATIONS; EXPERIENCE; TRANSPLANTATION; DONATION; VASCULATURE; RECIPIENT; OLDER;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.048
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Pure laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) is a unique intervention because it carries known risks and complications, yet carries no direct benefit to the donor. Therefore, it is critical to continually examine and improve quality of care. Objective: To identify factors affecting LDN outcomes and complications. Design, setting, and participants: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for 1204 consecutive LDNs performed from March 2000 through August 2012. Intervention: LDN performed at an academic training center. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Using multivariable regression, we assessed the effect of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), laterality, and vascular variation on operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), complications, and length of stay. Results and limitations: The following variables were associated with longer operative time (data given as parameter estimate plus or minus the standard error): female sex (9.09 +/- 2.43; p < 0.001), higher BMI (1.03 +/- 0.32; p = 0.001), two (7.87 +/- 2.70; p = 0.004) and three or more (22.45 +/- 7.13; p = 0.002) versus one renal artery, and early renal arterial branching (5.67 +/- 2.82; p = 0.045), while early renal arterial branching (7.81 +/- 3.85; p = 0.043) was associated with higher EBL. Overall, 8.2% of LDNs experienced complications, and by modified Clavien classification, 74 (5.9%) were grade 1, 13 (1.1%) were grade 2a, 10 (0.8%) were grade 2b, and 2 (0.2%) were grade 2c. There were no grade 3 or 4 complications. Three or more renal arteries (odds ratio [OR]: 2.74; 95% CI, 1.05-7.16; p = 0.04) and late renal vein confluence (OR: 2.42; 95% CI, 1.50-3.91; p = 0.0003) were associated with more complications. Finally, we did not find an association of the independent variables with length of stay. A limitation is that warm ischemia time was not assessed. Conclusions: In our series, renal vascular variation prolonged operative time and was associated with more complications. While complicated donor anatomy is not a contraindication of LDN, surgical decision-making should take into consideration these results. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology.
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 664
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Early experience of a living donor kidney transplant program [J].
Alcaraz, Antonio ;
RosaleS, Antonio ;
Guirado, Lluis ;
Diaz, Joan M. ;
Musquera, Mireia ;
Villavicencio, Humberto .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 50 (03) :542-548
[2]   Postoperative pain and convalescence in living kidney donors-laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: A randomized study [J].
Andersen, MH ;
Mathisen, L ;
Oyen, O ;
Edwin, B ;
Digernes, R ;
Kvarstein, G ;
Tonnessen, TI ;
Wahl, AK ;
Hanestad, BR ;
Fosse, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 6 (06) :1438-1443
[3]   Complications of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy and their management: The UCLA experience [J].
Breda, A. ;
Veale, J. ;
Liao, J. ;
Schulam, P. G. .
UROLOGY, 2007, 69 (01) :49-52
[4]   Incidence of ureteral strictures after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy [J].
Breda, Alberto ;
Bui, Matthew H. ;
Liao, Joseph C. ;
Gritsch, H. Albin ;
Schulam, Peter G. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (03) :1065-1068
[5]   Laparoscopic procurement of kidneys with multiple renal arteries is associated with increased ureteral complications in the recipient [J].
Carter, JT ;
Freise, CE ;
McTaggart, RA ;
Mahanty, HD ;
Kang, SM ;
Chan, SH ;
Feng, S ;
Roberts, JP ;
Posselt, AM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 (06) :1312-1318
[6]   Living-donor kidney transplantation: A review of the current practices for the live donor [J].
Davis, CL ;
Delmonico, FL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2005, 16 (07) :2098-2110
[7]   Critical Analysis of Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy in the Setting of Complex Renal Vasculature: Initial Experience and Intermediate Outcomes [J].
Disick, Grant I. S. ;
Shapiro, Michael E. ;
Miles, Ruth Ann ;
Munver, Ravi .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 (03) :451-455
[8]   Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: A Plea for the Right-Sided Approach [J].
Dols, Leonienke F. C. ;
Kok, Niels F. M. ;
Alwayn, Ian P. J. ;
Tran, T. C. Khe ;
Weimar, Willem ;
Ilzermans, Jan N. M. .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 87 (05) :745-750
[9]   Optimizing Allocation of Kidneys from Older Donors: Between Resources and Results [J].
Ekser, B. ;
Furian, L. ;
Rigotti, P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 11 (01) :183-183
[10]   Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in the presence of vascular anomalies: Evaluation of outcome [J].
Fettouh, Hazem Abouel .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2008, 22 (01) :77-81