Measurement equivalence: A non-technical primer on categorical multi-group confirmatory factor analysis in school psychology

被引:177
作者
Pendergast, Laura L. [1 ]
von der Embse, Nathaniel [1 ]
Kilgus, Stephen P. [2 ]
Eklund, Katie R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
Factor analysis; Invariance; Equivalence; Measurement; Bias; Diversity; SABRS; Categorical; School psychology; TESTING MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; OF-FIT INDEXES; EXPLORATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; BEHAVIOR RISK SCREENER; ORDINAL DATA; COVARIANCE; MODEL; CONSTRUCT; QUESTIONNAIRE; INDIVIDUATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsp.2016.11.002
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) have become a central component of school psychology research and practice, but EBIs are dependent upon the availability and use of evidence based assessments (EBAs) with diverse student populations. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MG-CFA) is an analytical tool that can be used to examine the validity and measurement equivalence/invariance of scores across diverse groups. The objective of this article is to provide a conceptual and procedural overview of categorical MG-CFA, as well as an illustrated example based on data from the Social and Academic Behavior Risk Screener (SABRS) - a tool designed for use in school-based interventions. This article serves as a non-technical primer on the topic of MG-CFA with ordinal (rating scale) data and does so through the framework of examining equivalence of measures used for EBIs within multi-tiered models - an understudied topic. To go along with the illustrated example, we have provided supplementary files that include sample data, Mplus input code, and an annotated guide for understanding the input code (http://dx.doLorg/10.1016/j.jsp.2016.11.002). Data needed to reproduce analyses in this article are available as supplemental materials (online only) in the Appendix of this article. (C) 2016 Society for the Study of School Psychology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 82
页数:18
相关论文
共 127 条
[1]  
Abedlaziz N., 2011, US-China Education Review B, V5, P734
[2]  
American Educational Research Association (AERA) American Psychological Association (APA) National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), 2014, Standards for educational and psychological testing, DOI DOI 10.1037/14855-004
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, MOD COMPR INT SCH PS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Handbook of social psychology
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Mplus user's guide
[6]  
Asparouhov T., 2006, Robust chi-square difference testing with mean and variance adjusted test statistics, DOI DOI 10.1177/0013164416683754
[7]   Multiple-Group Factor Analysis Alignment [J].
Asparouhov, Tihomir ;
Muthen, Bengt .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2014, 21 (04) :495-508
[8]   Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit [J].
Barrett, Paul .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2007, 42 (05) :815-824
[9]   On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA [J].
Beauducel, A ;
Herzberg, PY .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2006, 13 (02) :186-203
[10]  
Beck A T, 1974, Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry, V7, P151