Digital workflow in implant dentistry

被引:0
作者
Gintaute, Aiste [1 ]
Att, Wael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Freiburg, Dept Zahn Mund & Kieferheilkunde, Klin Zahnarztl Prothet, Hugstetter Str 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
来源
IMPLANTOLOGIE | 2017年 / 25卷 / 01期
关键词
Digital implant dentistry; workflow; guided implant surgery; radiographic template; surgical template; COMPUTER-TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS; SURGICAL GUIDES; ACCURACY; RESTORATIONS; IMPRESSIONS; TOMOGRAPHY; PROSTHESIS; GUIDELINES; EFFICIENCY; SCANNERS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The innovations of digital technologies in the interdisciplinary reconstructive and implant dentistry have opened new possibilities in the treatment planning and execution. Nowadays, the different virtual data sets can be integrated and fused in software, which leads to more information on the computer screen and enables a multi-layer visualization of the clinical situation. Therefore, new technologies in implant dentistry facilitate improvement of diagnostics and planning and treatment. Today's focus in implant dentistry is not only limited to successful osseointegration, but also to high standard of esthetic and functional implant prosthetics as well as the efficiency of treatment. This paper provides an overview about the digital technologies used in implant dentistry and different possibilities of the digital workflow.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 20
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [21] Jung RE, 2009, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V24, P92
  • [22] Karl M, 2012, QUINTESSENCE INT, V43, P555
  • [23] Quantitative evaluation of common errors in digital impression obtained by using an LED blue light in-office CAD/CAM system
    Kim, Jae-Hong
    Kim, Ki-Baek
    Kim, Sa-Hak
    Kim, Woong-Chul
    Kim, Hae-Young
    Kim, Ji-Hwan
    [J]. QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 46 (05): : 401 - 407
  • [24] THREE-DIMENSIONAL EVALUATION OF GAPS ASSOCIATED WITH FIXED DENTAL PROSTHESES FABRICATED WITH NEW TECHNOLOGIES
    Kim, Ki-Baek
    Kim, Jae-Hong
    Kim, Woong-Chul
    Kim, Ji-Hwan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2014, 112 (06) : 1432 - 1436
  • [25] Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions
    Lee, Sang J.
    Betensky, Rebecca A.
    Gianneschi, Grace E.
    Gallucci, German O.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 (06) : 715 - 719
  • [26] Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes
    Lee, Sang J.
    Gallucci, German O.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2013, 24 (01) : 111 - 115
  • [27] Complications and Patient-Centered Outcomes with an Implant-Supported Monolithic Zirconia Fixed Dental Prosthesis: 1 Year Results
    Limmer, Bryan
    Sanders, Anne E.
    Reside, Glenn
    Cooper, Lyndon F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2014, 23 (04): : 267 - 275
  • [28] Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications
    Loubele, M.
    Bogaerts, R.
    Van Dijck, E.
    Pauwels, R.
    Vanheusden, S.
    Suetens, P.
    Marchal, G.
    Sanderink, G.
    Jacobs, R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 71 (03) : 461 - 468
  • [29] An overview of passive and active vision techniques for hand-held 3D data acquisition
    Mada, SK
    Smith, ML
    Smith, LN
    Midha, S
    [J]. OPTP-IRELAND 2002: OPTICAL METROLOGY, IMAGING, AND MACHINE VISION, 2003, 4877 : 16 - 27
  • [30] Clinical problems of computer-guided implant surgery
    Moon S.-Y.
    Lee K.-R.
    Kim S.-G.
    Son M.-K.
    [J]. Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 38 (1)