Development and Validation of a Polypharmacy Knowledge Assessment Instrument

被引:0
作者
Thomas, John M. [1 ,2 ]
Mecca, Marcia C. [1 ,2 ]
Niehoff, Kristina M. [2 ,3 ]
Mecca, Adam P. [4 ]
Van Ness, Peter H. [5 ]
Brienza, Rebecca [1 ,2 ]
Hyson, Anne [1 ,2 ]
Jeffery, Sean [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[2] Vet Affairs Connecticut Healthcare Syst, Ctr Excellence Primary Care Educ, West Haven, CT USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pharm, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, New Haven, CT USA
[5] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Yale Program Aging, New Haven, CT USA
[6] Univ Connecticut, Sch Pharm, Storrs, CT USA
[7] Integrated Care Partners, Hartford Healthcare Grp, Wethersfield, CT USA
关键词
polypharmacy; deprescribing; geriatrics; primary care education; interprofessional education; GERIATRICS KNOWLEDGE; CRITERIA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Objective. To develop a brief instrument for academic pharmacists or physicians to use in assessing postgraduate residents' knowledge of polypharmacy. Methods. Five clinicians used a modified Delphi process to create a 26-item multiple-choice test to assess knowledge of polypharmacy in geriatric primary care. The test was distributed to 74 participants: 37 internal medicine (MD) residents, six nurse practitioner (NP) residents, nine primary care attendings, 12 pharmacists and pharmacy residents, and 10 geriatrics attendings and fellows. Construct validity was assessed using factor analysis and item response theory. Overall group differences were examined using a Kruskal-Wallis test, and between group differences were assessed using the Wil-coxon rank sum test. Results. The response rate for the survey was 89%. Factor analysis resulted in a one factor solution. Item response theory modeling yielded a 12-item and six-item test. For the 12-item test, the mean scores of geriatricians and pharmacists (88%) were higher than those of MD and NP residents (58%) and primary care attendings (61%). No differences were found between MD and NP residents and primary care attendings. Findings for the six-item test were similar. Conclusion. Both the 12-item and six-item versions of this polypharmacy test showed acceptable internal consistency and known groups validity and could be used in other academic settings. The similar scores between MD and NP residents and primary care attendings, which were significantly lower than scores for pharmacists and geriatricians, support the need for increased educational interventions.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1969, DELPHI METHOD EXPT S
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2008, Retooling for an aging America: Building the Healthcare Workforce
  • [3] [Anonymous], DISP UN MED
  • [4] CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING
    BENJAMINI, Y
    HOCHBERG, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) : 289 - 300
  • [5] Investigating latent constructs with item response models: A MATLAB IRTm toolbox
    Braeken, Johan
    Tuerlinckx, Francis
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2009, 41 (04) : 1127 - 1137
  • [6] Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
  • [7] DeVellis RF., 2017, Scale Development: Theory and Applications, V4th ed
  • [8] Health Outcomes Associated with Polypharmacy in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review
    Fried, Terri R.
    O'Leary, John
    Towle, Virginia
    Goldstein, Mary K.
    Trentalange, Mark
    Martin, Deanna K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2014, 62 (12) : 2261 - 2272
  • [9] Inappropriate prescribing in the elderly
    Gallagher, P.
    Barry, P.
    O'Mahony, D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 32 (02) : 113 - 121
  • [10] Hsu CC, 2007, PEER REVIEWED ELOCTR, V12, P1