Exploring the Nature of the Relationship Between CSR and Competitiveness

被引:305
作者
Vilanova, Marc [1 ]
Lozano, Josep Maria [1 ]
Arenas, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] ESADE, Sch Business, Inst Social Innovat, Barcelona 08034, Spain
关键词
competitiveness; responsible competitiveness; corporate reputation; corporate social responsibility; organizational strategy; paradox; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; STAKEHOLDER THEORY; BUSINESS ETHICS; PERFORMANCE; PARADOX; MANAGEMENT; STRATEGY; VALUES; GREEN;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-008-9812-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper explores the nature of the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and competitiveness. We start with the commonly held view that firm competitiveness is defined by the market. That is, the question of what are the critical competitiveness factors is answered by looking at how companies and financial analysts describe and evaluate a firm. To analyze this, we review the current state of the art on the relationship between CSR and competitiveness. Second, CSR criteria used by financial analysts is identified and compared with company valuation methods. Third, the results of a multi-stakeholder dialogue on CSR and competitiveness of the European financial sector are presented. As a conclusion, we argue that CSR and competitiveness relate through a learning and innovation cycle, where corporate values, policies and practices are permanently defined and re-defined. Thus, we propose that learning takes place as CSR is embedded in business processes, and that once it has been integrated, in turn, it generates innovative practices, and finally, competitiveness. At the end of the paper, we propose that CSR in practice consists of managing inherent paradoxes generated by the tension between CSR and business policies.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 69
页数:13
相关论文
共 108 条
[61]  
Korhonen J., 2006, EUROPEAN REV, V15, P200
[62]   Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide [J].
Lewis, MW .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2000, 25 (04) :760-776
[63]  
LOWELL BL, 2007, MCKINSEY Q, V1, P56
[64]  
Mackey A, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P817, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2007.25275676
[65]   Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective [J].
McWilliams, A ;
Siegel, D .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2001, 26 (01) :117-127
[66]  
MINTZBER H, 1993, RISE FALL STRATEGIC
[67]  
MINTZBERG H, 1987, HARVARD BUS REV, V65, P66
[68]  
Murths T.P., 1998, J. Strateg. Manage, V15, P113
[69]  
*OECD, 2000, REV OECD GUID MULT E
[70]   Does firm size comfound the relationship between corporate social performance and firm financial performance? [J].
Orlitzky, M .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2001, 33 (02) :167-180