Strategic Decisions in Task-Oriented Reading

被引:15
|
作者
Salmeron, Ladislao [1 ]
Vidal-Abarca, Eduardo [1 ]
Martinez, Tomas [1 ]
Mana, Amelia [1 ]
Gil, Laura [1 ]
Naumann, Johannes [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Valencia 46010, Spain
[2] German Inst Int Educ Res, Frankfurt, Germany
来源
关键词
reading comprehension assessment; reading literacy; task-oriented reading; QUESTION-ANSWERING TASKS; RESTRICTED FOCUS VIEWER; TEXT COMPREHENSION; LEXICAL QUALITY; MEMORY; INFORMATION; ATTENTION; RELEVANCE; TRACKING; ABILITY;
D O I
10.1017/sjp.2015.101
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Answering questions from texts are assessment and instructional activities that are frequently used in schools. Nevertheless, little is known about the strategic processes that students take while performing these tasks. We explored the amount and frequency that students initially read of a text before they answered questions pertaining to the material. In a procedure similar to the one used in the PISA (Program for International Students Assessment), one-hundred-seventy students between 7th and 9th grade read and answered several questions designed to assess task-oriented reading in three specific texts. We recorded on-line indexes that evaluated student behavior (e.g., the amount of text that students read before answering questions raised within a given text), performance, and comprehension skill. The results revealed that students skilled in comprehension initially read a high proportion of the texts, which in turn improved their overall performance in two of the three texts read (text 1: CI95%: 0.01 to 0.09; text 2: CI95%: -0.01 to 0.05; text 3: CI95%: 0.04 to 0.20). Therefore, we conclude that this strategic behavior should be considered during the assessment and instruction of reading literacy.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adaptive formative feedback to improve strategic search decisions in task-oriented reading
    Llorens, A. C.
    Cerdan, R.
    Vidal-Abarca, E.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2014, 30 (03) : 233 - 251
  • [2] Effect of delay on search decisions in a task-oriented reading environment
    Mana, Amelia
    Vidal-Abarca, Eduardo
    Salmeron, Ladislao
    METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2017, 12 (01) : 113 - 130
  • [3] Effect of delay on search decisions in a task-oriented reading environment
    Amelia Mañá
    Eduardo Vidal-Abarca
    Ladislao Salmerón
    Metacognition and Learning, 2017, 12 : 113 - 130
  • [4] Bridging Skill and Task-Oriented Reading
    Higgs, Karyn
    Magliano, Joseph P.
    Vidal-Abarca, Eduardo
    Martinez, Tomas
    McNamara, Danielle S.
    DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 2017, 54 (01) : 19 - 39
  • [5] Task-oriented reading efficiency: interplay of general cognitive ability, task demands, strategies and reading fluency
    Hautala, Jarkko
    Salmeron, Ladislao
    Tolvanen, Asko
    Loberg, Otto
    Leppanen, Paavo
    READING AND WRITING, 2022, 35 (08) : 1787 - 1813
  • [6] Task-oriented reading efficiency: interplay of general cognitive ability, task demands, strategies and reading fluency
    Jarkko Hautala
    Ladislao Salmerón
    Asko Tolvanen
    Otto Loberg
    Paavo Leppänen
    Reading and Writing, 2022, 35 : 1787 - 1813
  • [7] TASK-ORIENTED ARCHITECTURES
    BISIANI, R
    MAUERSBERG, H
    REDDY, R
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 1983, 71 (07) : 885 - 898
  • [8] COMPUTER CONFERENCING AND TASK-ORIENTED DECISIONS - IMPLICATIONS FOR GROUP DECISION SUPPORT
    SMITH, JY
    VANECEK, MT
    INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 1988, 14 (03) : 123 - 132
  • [9] Recording online processes in task-oriented reading with Read&Answer
    Eduardo Vidal-Abarca
    Tomás Martinez
    Ladislao Salmerón
    Raquel Cerdán
    Ramiro Gilabert
    Laura Gil
    Amelia Mañá
    Ana C. Llorens
    Ricardo Ferris
    Behavior Research Methods, 2011, 43 : 179 - 192
  • [10] Recording online processes in task-oriented reading with Read&Answer
    Vidal-Abarca, Eduardo
    Martinez, Tomas
    Salmeron, Ladislao
    Cerdan, Raquel
    Gilabert, Ramiro
    Gil, Laura
    Mana, Amelia
    Llorens, Ana C.
    Ferris, Ricardo
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2011, 43 (01) : 179 - 192