Positive and negative compatibility effects

被引:28
作者
Bavelier, D
Deruelle, C
Proksch, J
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Rochester, NY USA
[2] CNRS, Marseille, France
来源
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS | 2000年 / 62卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03212064
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This paper reports a series of four experiments that established a negative compatibility effect (NCE) by which compatible distracters led to slower and less accurate target performance than did incompatible ones (Experiment 1). This effect is interpreted as an early perceptual effect that delays the attribution of visual attention over the target location in the compatible condition. This view predicted that the NCE should be observed only when attention has to be selectively attributed to the target location. In Experiments 2 and 3, this prediction was tested by manipulating the perceptual load in the display. High perceptual load displays are known to require selective attention (Lavie, 1995). Accordingly, reliable NCEs were observed when high-load displays were used. In contrast, reduced NCEs were found in displays that did not require selective attention. Experiment 4 established that the manifestation of the NCE was influenced by low-level visual cues, such as brightness and contrast. Overall, these experiments indicated that the NCE can be understood as an early perceptual effect, which arises from a conflict between the cues that guide the distribution of attention when the task requires selective attention.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 112
页数:13
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]   STIMULUS-RESPONSE COMPATIBILITY WITH RELEVANT AND IRRELEVANT STIMULUS DIMENSIONS THAT DO AND DO NOT OVERLAP WITH THE RESPONSE [J].
KORNBLUM, S ;
LEE, JW .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1995, 21 (04) :855-875
[12]   PERCEPTUAL ORGANIZATION AND FOCUSED ATTENTION - THE ROLE OF OBJECTS AND PROXIMITY IN VISUAL PROCESSING [J].
KRAMER, AF ;
JACOBSON, A .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1991, 50 (03) :267-284
[13]  
KRAMER AG, 1995, CONVERGING OPERATION
[14]   PERCEPTUAL LOAD AS A NECESSARY CONDITION FOR SELECTIVE ATTENTION [J].
LAVIE, N .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1995, 21 (03) :451-468
[15]   On the efficiency of visual selective attention: Efficient visual search leads to inefficient distractor rejection [J].
Lavie, N ;
Cox, S .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1997, 8 (05) :395-398
[16]   THE FLANKER COMPATIBILITY EFFECT AS A FUNCTION OF VISUAL ANGLE, ATTENTIONAL FOCUS, VISUAL TRANSIENTS, AND PERCEPTUAL LOAD - A SEARCH FOR BOUNDARY-CONDITIONS [J].
MILLER, J .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1991, 49 (03) :270-288
[17]   DIVIDED ATTENTION - EVIDENCE FOR CO-ACTIVATION WITH REDUNDANT SIGNALS [J].
MILLER, J .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 14 (02) :247-279
[18]   FOREST BEFORE TREES - PRECEDENCE OF GLOBAL FEATURES IN VISUAL-PERCEPTION [J].
NAVON, D .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1977, 9 (03) :353-383
[19]   HOW MANY TREES DOES IT TAKE TO MAKE A FOREST [J].
NAVON, D .
PERCEPTION, 1983, 12 (03) :239-254
[20]  
NOTHDURFT HC, 1994, CIBA F SYMP, V184, P245