Prospects for the classical biological control of Calotropis procera (Apocynaceae) using coevolved insects

被引:9
作者
Dhileepan, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Biosecur Queensland, Dept Agr Fisheries & Forestry, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
native range survey; weed; calotrope; rubber bush; Sodom apple; AIT; R; BR; FUNGAL PATHOGENS; CONTROL AGENT; WEST-BENGAL; LIFE-CYCLE; PLANT; ASCLEPIADACEAE; LEPIDOPTERA; COLEOPTERA; POLLINATION;
D O I
10.1080/09583157.2014.912611
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Calotropis procera (Apocynaceae), a native of tropical Africa, the Middle East and the Indian subcontinent, is a serious environmental and rangeland weed of Australia and Brazil. It is also a weed in Hawaii in the USA, the Caribbean Islands, the Seychelles, Mexico, Thailand, Vietnam and many Pacific Islands. In the native range C. procera has many natural enemies, thus classical biological control could be the most cost-effective option for its long-term management. Based on field surveys in India and a literature search, some 65 species of insects and 5 species of mites have been documented on C. procera and another congeneric-invador C. gigantea in the native range. All the leaf-feeding and stem-boring agents recorded on Calotropis spp. have wide host range. Three predispersal seed predators, the Aak weevil Paramecops farinosus, the Aak fruit fly Dacus persicus in the Indian subcontinent and the Sodom apple fruit fly Dacus longistylus in the Middle East, have been identified as prospective biological control agents based on their field host range. In Australia and Brazil, where C. procera has the potential to spread across vast areas, pre-dispersal seed predators would help to limit the spread of the weed. While the fruits of C. procera vary in size and shape across its range, those from India are similar to the ones in Australia and Brazil. Hence, seed-feeding insects from India are more likely to be suitable due to adaptation to fruit size and morphology. Future survey efforts for potential biological control agents should focus on North Africa.
引用
收藏
页码:977 / 998
页数:22
相关论文
共 127 条
[21]  
Ben-Dov Yair, 2012, Israel Journal of Entomology, V41-42, P21
[22]  
Bezzi M., 1916, Bulletin of Entomological Research London, V7, DOI 10.1017/S0007485300017430
[23]  
Bezzi M., 1915, Bulletin of Entomological Research London, V6, DOI 10.1017/S0007485300044369
[24]  
Bhagat R.C., 2012, Indian Journal of Applied and Pure Biology, V27, P1
[25]  
Braby M. F., 2000, BUTTERFLIES AUSTR, V2, P593
[26]  
Brandao M., 1995, Daphne, Revista do Herbario PAMG da EPAMIG, V5, P68
[27]  
Campbell S., 2013, P 12 QUEENSL WEED S, P11
[28]  
Campbell S., 2010, DISTRIBUTION INVASIV
[29]  
Campolucci P., 1990, 10 CTR SPER AGR FOR
[30]  
Carroll L.E., 2006, PEST FRUIT FLIES WOR