Challenge your stereotypes! Human Library and its impact on prejudice in Poland

被引:15
作者
Groyecka, Agata [1 ]
Witkowska, Marta [2 ]
Wrobel, Monika [1 ]
Klamut, Olga [1 ]
Skrodzka, Magdalena [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wroclaw, Inst Psychol, Dawida 1, PL-50527 Wroclaw, Poland
[2] Univ Warsaw, Fac Psychol, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
Human Library; intergroup contact; interventions; LGBT; social distance; MORAL EXCLUSION; SOCIAL DISTANCE; INTERGROUP; INTOLERANCE; DIVERSITY; ATTITUDES; RACISM; RIGHTS;
D O I
10.1002/casp.2402
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Human Library is a public event aimed at reducing stereotypes and prejudices, in the form of an interactive, contact-based intervention. It employs the logic of a regular library yet with readers "borrowing" Living Books, which are real people representing various minority groups. Readers engage in 30-min conversations, during which they can challenge their stereotypes and widen their scope of knowledge and understanding. This pre-post intervention study examined the effectiveness of the Human Library (held in Wroclaw, Poland) in reducing social distance towards Roma, Muslims, dark-skinned, and transgender people, as well as in decreasing homonegativity. Also, we measured whether participation in the Human Library changes individual attitudes towards diverse workgroups. We found that the Human Library decreased social distance towards Muslims. Also, the more Living Books that the participants "read," the bigger the shift in their social distance towards Muslims. Furthermore, we observed an increase in positive affective attitude towards working in diversified groups, as a result of participation in the event. The study serves as partial support for the effectiveness of the Human Library in altering one's attitude towards minority groups and diversity. The intervention is discussed as a promising but not yet entirely understood tool to improve intergroup relations.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 322
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Abergel R., 2005, DONT JUDGE BOOK ITS
[2]  
Allport G., 1954, Becoming
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, FRAG REB EU IM EV EU
[4]   Measuring Sexism, Racism, Sexual Prejudice, Ageism, Classism, and Religious Intolerance: The Intolerant Schema Measure [J].
Aosved, Allison C. ;
Long, Patricia J. ;
Voller, Emily K. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 39 (10) :2321-2354
[5]   Preventing prejudice and improving intergroup attitudes: A meta-analysis of child and adolescent training programs [J].
Beelmann, Andreas ;
Heinemann, Kim Sarah .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 35 (01) :10-24
[6]  
Bogardus ES, 1933, SOCIOL SOC RES, V17, P265
[7]   Public Opinion About Gay Rights and Gay Marriage [J].
Brewer, Paul R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH, 2014, 26 (03) :279-282
[9]  
CBOS, 2017, STOS OS OR HOM ZWIAZ
[10]  
CBOS, 2015, Postawy wobec islamu i muzumanw. Komunikat z bada