Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in carotid artery disease: does automated image registration improve image quality?

被引:2
|
作者
Menke, Jan [1 ]
Larsen, Joerg [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Braunschweig Teaching Hosp, Inst Roentgendiagnost, D-38118 Braunschweig, Germany
关键词
Carotid artery disease; Carotid stenosis; Magnetic resonance angiography; Automated image registration; SUBTRACTION CT ANGIOGRAPHY; NONRIGID REGISTRATION; BONE-SUBTRACTION; ISCHEMIC-STROKE; STENOSIS; GUIDELINE; MOTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-008-1257-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is a noninvasive imaging alternative to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for patients with carotid artery disease. In DSA, image quality can be improved by shifting the mask image if the patient has moved during angiography. This study investigated whether such image registration may also help to improve the image quality of carotid MRA. Data from 370 carotid MRA examinations of patients likely to have carotid artery disease were prospectively collected. The standard nonregistered MRAs were compared to automatically linear, affine and warp registered MRA by using three image quality parameters: the vessel detection probability (VDP) in maximum intensity projection (MIP) images, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in MIP images, and contrast-to-noise ratio in three-dimensional image volumes. A body shift of less than 1 mm occurred in 96.2% of cases. Analysis of variance revealed no significant influence of image registration and body shift on image quality (p > 0.05). In conclusion, standard contrast-enhanced carotid MRA usually requires no image registration to improve image quality and is generally robust against any naturally occurring body shift.
引用
收藏
页码:1232 / 1238
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Coronary artery angiography and myocardial viability imaging: a 3.0-T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance coronary artery angiography with Gd-BOPTA
    Yun, Hong
    Jin, Hang
    Yang, Shan
    Huang, Dong
    Chen, Zhang-wei
    Zeng, Meng-su
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2014, 30 (01) : 99 - 108
  • [22] High resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the evaluation of rabbit carotid artery
    Wu, RH
    Kallmes, DF
    RIVISTA DI NEURORADIOLOGIA, 2005, 18 (5-6): : 529 - 536
  • [23] High Spatial and Temporal Resolution Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography Using Compressed Sensing with Magnitude Image Subtraction
    Rapacchi, Stanislas
    Han, Fei
    Natsuaki, Yutaka
    Kroeker, Randall
    Plotnik, Adam
    Lehrman, Evan
    Sayre, James
    Laub, Gerhard
    Finn, J. Paul
    Hu, Peng
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2014, 71 (05) : 1771 - 1783
  • [24] Contrast-enhanced body magnetic resonance angiography: how we do it
    Aguet, Julien
    Gill, Navjot
    Tassos, Vivian P.
    Chavhan, Govind B.
    Lam, Christopher Z.
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2022, 52 (02) : 262 - 270
  • [25] Contrast-enhanced body magnetic resonance angiography: how we do it
    Julien Aguet
    Navjot Gill
    Vivian P. Tassos
    Govind B. Chavhan
    Christopher Z. Lam
    Pediatric Radiology, 2022, 52 : 262 - 270
  • [26] Carotid artery stenosis:: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography
    Sundgren, PC
    Sundén, P
    Lindgren, A
    Lanke, J
    Holtås, S
    Larsson, EM
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2002, 44 (07) : 592 - 599
  • [27] Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Internal Carotid Artery Disease
    Py, Marco Oliveira
    Andre, Charles
    STROKE, 2009, 40 (01) : E1 - E1
  • [28] Pulmonary arteriovenous malformations - Diagnosis by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography
    Khalil, A
    Farres, MT
    Mangiapan, G
    Tassart, M
    Bigot, JM
    Carette, MF
    CHEST, 2000, 117 (05) : 1399 - 1403
  • [29] Measuring carotid stenosis on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography - Diagnostic performance and reproducibility of 3 different methods
    U-King-Im, JMKS
    Trivedi, RA
    Cross, JJ
    Higgins, NJP
    Hollingworth, W
    Graves, M
    Joubert, I
    Kirkpatrick, PJ
    Antoun, NM
    Gillard, JH
    STROKE, 2004, 35 (09) : 2083 - 2088
  • [30] Noncontrast-enhanced magnetic resonance renal angiography using a repetitive artery and venous labelling technique at 3 T: comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in subjects with normal renal function
    Park, Sung Yoon
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Kim, EunJu
    Park, Byung Kwan
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (02) : 533 - 540