Thermo-Ecological Cost (TEC)-comparison of energy-ecological efficiency of renewable and non-renewable energy technologies

被引:11
|
作者
Stanek, Wojciech [1 ]
机构
[1] Silesian Tech Univ, Fac Energy & Environm Engn, Konarskiego 22, PL-44100 Gliwice, Poland
关键词
Energy efficiency; Energy technologies; System exergy analysis; Thermo-ecological cost; Energy-ecological efficiency; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; WIND; POWER; ELECTRICITY; INTEGRATION; SYSTEMS; SECTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2022.125152
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The article presents problems related to the assessment of local energy efficiency of energy systems. In practice, local energy efficiency is commonly used to evaluate these systems, which is not a correct criterion to compare different energy technologies, especially non-renewable and renewable energy systems. For the correct assessment of efficiency, a system analysis in the global balance boundary should be used. In the paper system analysis algorithm is discussed - Thermo-Ecological Cost (TEC), which is a correct tool to compare energy and ecological efficiency of different energy systems. Problems with the correct application of the energy and environmental efficiency assessment are illustrated with examples of results of local and system (TEC) evaluation of non-renewable and renewable energy systems efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Energy-ecological efficiency of the fuel cell electric vehicle powered by different biofuels
    Danielle Rodrigues de Moraes
    Laene Oliveira Soares
    Vanessa de Almeida Guimarães
    Katia Ferreira de Oliveira
    Luis Hernández-Callejo
    Gisele Maria Ribeiro Vieira
    Ronney Arismel Mancebo Boloy
    Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2022, 24 : 1389 - 1402
  • [32] Energy prosumerism using photovoltaic power plant and hydrogen combustion engine: Energy and thermo-ecological assessment
    Simla, Tomasz
    Gazda, Wieslaw
    Stanek, Wojciech
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2023, 48 (48) : 18187 - 18200
  • [33] Energy-ecological efficiency of the fuel cell electric vehicle powered by different biofuels
    de Moraes, Danielle Rodrigues
    Soares, Laene Oliveira
    Guimaraes, Vanessa de Almeida
    de Oliveira, Katia Ferreira
    Hernandez-Callejo, Luis
    Ribeiro Vieira, Gisele Maria
    Mancebo Boloy, Ronney Arismel
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2022, 24 (05) : 1389 - 1402
  • [34] Ecological houses of Southern Kazakhstan using renewable energy sources
    Yussupov, Ardasher Namazbay
    Yussupova, Akmaral Ardasherovna
    SMART AND SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 11 (03) : 593 - 607
  • [35] The cost of conserved water for power generation from renewable energy technologies in Alberta, Canada
    Ali, Babkir
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 150 : 201 - 213
  • [36] A comparative study on household level energy consumption and related emissions from renewable (biomass) and non-renewable energy sources in Bangladesh
    Baul, T. K.
    Datta, D.
    Alam, A.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 114 : 598 - 608
  • [37] Invention in energy technologies: Comparing energy efficiency and renewable energy inventions at the firm level
    Rexhaeuser, Sascha
    Loeschel, Andreas
    ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 83 : 206 - 217
  • [38] Comparison of shaft and flash smelting processes of copper production using thermo-ecological cost method
    Boryczko, Bozena
    Donizak, Janusz
    Holda, Adam
    Kolenda, Zygmunt
    Norwisz, Jan
    ECOS 2006: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EFFICIENCY, COST, OPTIMIZATION, SIMULATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF ENERGY SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-3, 2006, : 663 - +
  • [39] Heuristic Strategies for NFV-Enabled Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Management in the Future IoT World
    Tipantuna, Christian
    Hesselbach, Xavier
    Unger, Walter
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 125000 - 125031
  • [40] The impact of non-renewable energy production and energy usage on carbon emissions: Evidence from China
    Zhang, YunQian
    Li, Li
    Sadiq, Muhammad
    Chien, FengSheng
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 35 (04) : 2248 - 2269