Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized comparison on immediate continence rates

被引:80
|
作者
Asimakopoulos, Anastasios D. [1 ,2 ]
Topazio, Luca [1 ]
De Angelis, Michele [1 ]
Agro, Enrico Finazzi [2 ]
Pastore, Antonio Luigi [3 ]
Fuschi, Andrea [1 ,3 ]
Annino, Filippo [1 ]
机构
[1] San Donato Hosp, Dept Urol, Usl Toscana Sud Est, Arezzo, Italy
[2] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Expt Med & Surg, UOC Urol, Rome, Italy
[3] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Medicosurg Sci & Biotechnol, Urol Unit, Latina, Italy
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2019年 / 33卷 / 07期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Randomized controlled trial; Retzius; Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; Urinary continence; EARLY URINARY CONTINENCE; PRESERVATION; INCONTINENCE; RECOVERY; COMPLEX; MEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-018-6499-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundPost-prostatectomy urinary incontinence is an adverse event leading to significant distress. Our aim was to evaluate immediate urinary continence (UC) recovery in a single-surgeon prospective randomized comparative study between the traditional robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (TR-RALP) and the Retzius-sparing RALP (RS-RALP), for the treatment of the clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa).Methods102 consecutive PCa patients were prospectively randomized to TR-RALP (57) or RS-RALP (45). Postoperative continence was defined as patient-reported absence of leakage or use of 0 pads/day. The immediate continence rate and 95% confidence interval (CI 95%) were calculated for each treatment. Univariable and multivariate logistic regressions were used to assess predictors of immediate continence following RALP. Continence rates from 1 to 6 months were calculated by Kaplan-Meier curves; log-rank test was used for the curve comparison. Two analyses were performed, considering a per-protocol (PP) population regarding all randomized patients that received nerve-sparing RALP and an Intention-To-Treat (ITT) population regarding all randomized patients that received RALP.ResultsIn the PP analysis, the rates of immediate continence were 12/40 (30%) (CI 95% 17-47%) for the TR-RALP and 20/39 (51.3%) (CI 95% 35-68%) for the RS-RALP (p=0.05). In the ITT analysis, the corresponding rates were 12/57 (21%) (CI 95% 11-34%) for the TR-RALP and 23/45 (51%) (CI 95% 36-66%) for the RS-RALP (p=0.001). Median time to continence was 21 days for the TR-RALP and 1day for RS-RALP, respectively (p=0.02). The relative Kaplan-Meier curves regarding continence resulted statistically different when compared with the log rank test (p=0.02). In the multivariate analysis, lower age and the Retzius-sparing approach were significantly associated to earlier continence recovery.ConclusionsThe Retzius-sparing approach significantly reduces time to continence following RALP. Further studies are required to confirm the reproducibility of our results and investigate the role of the RS-RALP as an additional protective factor for postoperative continence in the elderly population.
引用
收藏
页码:2187 / 2196
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized comparison on immediate continence rates
    Anastasios D. Asimakopoulos
    Luca Topazio
    Michele De Angelis
    Enrico Finazzi Agrò
    Antonio Luigi Pastore
    Andrea Fuschi
    Filippo Annino
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2019, 33 : 2187 - 2196
  • [2] Comparison of Retzius-Sparing versus Standard Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer
    Tahra, A.
    Sen, U. T.
    Sobay, R.
    Inkaya, A.
    Kucuk, E., V
    Boylu, U.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2022, 46 (05): : 293 - 300
  • [3] Comparison of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy vs standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis
    Jiang, Yu-Li
    Zheng, Gao-Feng
    Jiang, Ze-Peng
    Zhen-Li
    Zhou, Xie-Lai
    Zhou, Jin
    Ye, Chun-Hua
    Wang, Kang-Er
    BMC UROLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [4] Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Perioperative and immediate continence outcomes of an initial series
    Algarra, R.
    Salas, T.
    Garcia, S.
    Arance, I
    Sanchez de la Muela, P.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2020, 44 (08): : 542 - 548
  • [5] Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Nagasubramanian, Santhosh
    Leow, Jeffrey J.
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2025, 39 : S27 - S34
  • [6] Comparison of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy vs standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis
    Yu-Li Jiang
    Gao-Feng Zheng
    Ze-Peng Jiang
    Xie-Lai Zhen-Li
    Jin Zhou
    Chun-Hua Zhou
    Kang-Er Ye
    BMC Urology, 20
  • [7] Contribution of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to the mechanism of urinary continence as demonstrated by dynamic MRI
    Kadono, Yoshifumi
    Nohara, Takahiro
    Kawaguchi, Shohei
    Naito, Renato
    Kadomoto, Suguru
    Iwamoto, Hiroaki
    Yaegashi, Hiroshi
    Shigehara, Kazuyoshi
    Izumi, Kouji
    Yoshida, Kotaro
    Gabata, Toshifumi
    Mizokami, Atsushi
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [8] Predictors for immediate recovery of continence following Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a case-control study
    Qin, Haixiang
    Qiu, Xuefeng
    Ma, Haoxing
    Xu, Linfeng
    Xu, Liu
    Li, Xiaogong
    Guo, Hongqian
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2019, 51 (05) : 825 - 830
  • [9] Retzius-Sparing versus Standard Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparative Prospective Study of Nearly 500 Patients
    Umari, Paolo
    Eden, Christopher
    Cahill, Declan
    Rizzo, Michele
    Eden, Dominic
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 205 (03) : 780 - 790
  • [10] Predictors for immediate recovery of continence following Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a case–control study
    Haixiang Qin
    Xuefeng Qiu
    Haoxing Ma
    Linfeng Xu
    Liu Xu
    Xiaogong Li
    Hongqian Guo
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2019, 51 : 825 - 830