How Angular Velocity Features and Different Gyroscope Noise Types Interact and Determine Orientation Estimation Accuracy

被引:43
作者
Pasciuto, Ilaria [1 ]
Ligorio, Gabriele [2 ]
Bergamini, Elena [1 ]
Vannozzi, Giuseppe [1 ]
Sabatini, Angelo Maria [2 ]
Cappozzo, Aurelio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rome Foro Italico, Dept Movement Human & Hlth Sci, Interuniv Ctr Bioengn Human Neuromusculoskeletal, I-00135 Rome, Italy
[2] Scuola Super Sant Anna, BioRobot Inst, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
关键词
3D orientation; MEMS gyroscopes; noise sources; motion analysis; gait; biomechanics; human; numerical integration; inertial sensors; GAIT ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.3390/s150923983
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In human movement analysis, 3D body segment orientation can be obtained through the numerical integration of gyroscope signals. These signals, however, are affected by errors that, for the case of micro-electro-mechanical systems, are mainly due to: constant bias, scale factor, white noise, and bias instability. The aim of this study is to assess how the orientation estimation accuracy is affected by each of these disturbances, and whether it is influenced by the angular velocity magnitude and 3D distribution across the gyroscope axes. Reference angular velocity signals, either constant or representative of human walking, were corrupted with each of the four noise types within a simulation framework. The magnitude of the angular velocity affected the error in the orientation estimation due to each noise type, except for the white noise. Additionally, the error caused by the constant bias was also influenced by the angular velocity 3D distribution. As the orientation error depends not only on the noise itself but also on the signal it is applied to, different sensor placements could enhance or mitigate the error due to each disturbance, and special attention must be paid in providing and interpreting measures of accuracy for orientation estimation algorithms.
引用
收藏
页码:23983 / 24001
页数:19
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]  
Ferraris F., 1995, Sensors and Materials, V7, P311
[12]   How Good Is Your Gyro? [J].
Grewal, Mohinder ;
Andrews, Angus .
IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS MAGAZINE, 2010, 30 (01) :12-+
[13]   Review of fall risk assessment in geriatric populations using inertial sensors [J].
Howcroft, Jennifer ;
Kofman, Jonathan ;
Lemaire, Edward D. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2013, 10
[14]  
IEEE-SA S.B., 1998, IEEE STAND SPEC FORM
[15]   Methods for spherical data analysis and visualization [J].
Leong, P ;
Carlile, S .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 1998, 80 (02) :191-200
[16]   Error analysis of direction cosines and quaternion parameters techniques for aircraft attitude determination [J].
Lovren, N ;
Pieper, JK .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 1998, 34 (03) :983-989
[17]   Gait phase detection and discrimination between walking-jogging activities using hidden Markov models applied to foot motion data from a gyroscope [J].
Mannini, Andrea ;
Sabatini, Angelo Maria .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2012, 36 (04) :657-661
[18]   Design and Evaluation of NEUROBike: A Neurorehabilitative Platform for Bedridden Post-Stroke Patients [J].
Monaco, Vito ;
Galardi, Giuseppe ;
Coscia, Martina ;
Martelli, Dario ;
Micera, Silvestro .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, 2012, 20 (06) :845-852
[19]  
Sabatini A M., 2006, Computational Intelligence for Movement Sciences: Neural Networks and Other Emerging Techniques
[20]   Estimating Three-Dimensional Orientation of Human Body Parts by Inertial/Magnetic Sensing [J].
Sabatini, Angelo Maria .
SENSORS, 2011, 11 (02) :1489-1525