Is accreditation good for the strategic decision making of traditional business schools?

被引：66
作者：
Julian, Scott D. [1 ]
Ofori-Dankwa, Joseph C. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Saginaw Valley State Univ, Dept Management & Mkt, Univ Ctr, MI 48710 USA
来源：
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION | 2006年 / 5卷 / 02期
关键词：
D O I：
10.5465/AMLE.2006.21253788
中图分类号：
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号：
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要：
In this essay we take a deliberately provocative stance in assessing the utility of the accreditation process in relation to the strategic decision making of business schools given increasing amounts of environmental turbulence, competitiveness, and potentially discontinuous change. We argue that the core process characteristics of accreditation are not well suited for the new competitive terrain that business schools face and may act as impediments for effective adaptation. We conclude by making suggestions for accredited schools, agencies, and researchers.
引用
收藏
页码：225 / 233
页数：9
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
*AACSB, 2002, ACCR MAINT HDB
[2]  
[Anonymous], ACAD MANAGEMENT EXEC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, MANAGEMENT INNOVATIO
[4]  
[Anonymous], STRATEGIC CONTROL SY
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Academy of Management Learning Education
[6]  
[Anonymous], J BUSINESS STRATEGIE
[7]  
Argyris C., 1978, Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice
[8]  
Association of Collegiate Business Schools and Programs (ACBSP), 2004, ACBSP STAND CRIT DEM
[9]  
Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB International), 2018, EL PROC ACCR STAND A
[10]  
Bailey J., 2000, J EDUC BUS, V75, P183
123456