共 50 条
Preformulated Implementation Intentions to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Cluster-Randomized Trial
被引:26
|作者:
Lo, Siu Hing
[1
]
Good, Anna
[2
]
Sheeran, Paschal
[3
]
Baio, Gianluca
[4
]
Rainbow, Sandra
[5
]
Vart, Gemma
[1
]
von Wagner, Christian
[1
]
Wardle, Jane
[1
]
机构:
[1] UCL, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] Univ Sussex, Sch Psychol, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[3] Univ Sheffield, Dept Psychol, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
[4] UCL, Dept Stat Sci, London WC1E 6BT, England
[5] St Marks Hosp, Bowel Canc Screening Programme, London Hub, London EC1V 2PS, England
关键词:
colorectal cancer;
screening;
implementation intentions;
interventions;
socioeconomic deprivation;
OCCULT BLOOD-TESTS;
IMPROVE PARTICIPATION;
INCREASING ATTENDANCE;
INTERVENTION;
METAANALYSIS;
POPULATION;
PATTERNS;
BARRIERS;
HEALTH;
PLANS;
D O I:
10.1037/a0033507
中图分类号:
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号:
040203 ;
摘要:
Objective: To evaluate an intervention based on implementation intention principles designed to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening, and to examine differential efficacy by socioeconomic deprivation. Method: In England, adults aged between 60 and 69 years are invited for biennial fecal occult blood testing. A test kit and an information leaflet are mailed to each individual by the "Hubs" that deliver the national screening program. In the intervention group, three preformulated implementation intentions, based on known barriers to carrying out the test, were added to the information leaflet. Over a 12-week period, each week was randomly allocated to either the intervention (n = 12,414 invitations) or the control condition (n = 10,768), with uptake recorded at the Hub. Socioeconomic deprivation of each individual's area of residence was categorized into tertiles. Results: There was no overall difference in uptake between control (40.4%) and intervention (39.7%) conditions, odds ratio (OR) = 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.91, 1.04]. There was an interaction with deprivation, OR = 1.11, 95% CI [1.04, 1.18], but the positive effect observed in the lowest socioeconomic status (SES) tertile was small (35.2% vs. 33.0%), OR = 1.103, 95% CI [1.01, 1.21], and offset by a negative effect in the least deprived tertile (45.6% vs. 48.2%), OR = 0.90, 95% CI [0.82, 0.99]. The intervention had no significant effect in the middle tertile (38.9% vs. 40.8%), OR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.81, 1.04]. Conclusion: Preformulated implementation intentions did not increase overall colorectal cancer screening uptake and failed to make a sufficiently large impact on uptake among lower SES groups to merit their future use in this context.
引用
收藏
页码:998 / 1002
页数:5
相关论文