Genetic Population Structure of Shoal Bass within their Native Range\

被引:9
|
作者
Taylor, Andrew T. [1 ]
Tringali, Michael D. [2 ]
Sammons, Steven M. [3 ]
Ingram, Travis R. [4 ]
O'Rouke, Patrick M. [5 ]
Peterson, Douglas L. [6 ]
Long, James M. [7 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Nat Resource Ecol & Management, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
[2] Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservat Commiss, Fish & Wildlife Res Inst, St Petersburg, FL 33701 USA
[3] Auburn Univ, Sch Fisheries Aquaculture & Aquat Sci, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[4] Georgia Dept Nat Resources, 2024 Newton Rd, Albany, GA 31701 USA
[5] Georgia Power Co, 2480 Maner Rd Southeast, Atlanta, GA 30339 USA
[6] Univ Georgia, Warnell Sch Forestry & Nat Resources, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[7] Oklahoma State Univ, US Geol Survey, Oklahoma Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, Dept Nat Resource Ecol & Management, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
关键词
FLINT RIVER; INBREEDING COEFFICIENTS; OUTBREEDING DEPRESSION; PAIRWISE RELATEDNESS; LARGEMOUTH BASS; HABITAT USE; CONSERVATION; GEORGIA; MOVEMENT; ALABAMA;
D O I
10.1002/nafm.10048
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Endemic to the Apalachicola River basin of the southeastern USA, the Shoal Bass Micropterus cataractae is a fluvial-specialist sport fish that is imperiled because of anthropogenic habitat alteration. To counter population declines, restorative stocking efforts are becoming an increasingly relevant management strategy. However, population genetic structure within the species is currently unknown, but it could influence management decisions, such as brood source location. Leveraging a collaborative effort to collect and genotype specimens with 16 microsatellite loci, our objective was to characterize hierarchical population structure and genetic differentiation of the Shoal Bass across its native range, including an examination of structuring mechanisms, such as relatedness and inbreeding levels. Specimens identified as Shoal Bass were collected from 13 distinct sites (N ranged from 17 to 209 per location) and were then taxonomically screened to remove nonnative congeners and hybrids (pure Shoal Bass N ranged from 13 to 183 per location). Our results revealed appreciable population structure, with five distinct Shoal Bass populations identifiable at the uppermost hierarchical level that generally corresponded with natural geographic features and anthropogenic barriers. Substructure was recovered within several of these populations, wherein differences appeared related to spatial isolation and local population dynamics. An analysis of molecular variance revealed that 3.6% of the variation in our data set was accounted for among three larger river drainages, but substructure within each river drainage also explained an additional 8.9% of genetic variation, demonstrating that management at a scale lower than the river drainage level would likely best conserve genetic diversity. Results provide a population genetic framework that can inform future management decisions, such as brood source location, so that genetic diversity within and among populations is conserved and overall adaptability of the species is maintained.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 564
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Analysis of genetic diversity and population structure within the Icelandic cattle breed using molecular markers
    Asbjarnardottir, M. G.
    Kristjansson, T.
    Jonsson, M. B.
    Hallsson, J. H.
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2010, 60 (04): : 203 - 210
  • [32] Habitat use and population structure of the shoal chub (Macrhybopsis hyostoma) in the upper Mississippi River basin
    Gaughan, Sarah
    Steffensen, Kirk
    Lu, Guoqing
    ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY OF FISHES, 2019, 102 (06) : 901 - 914
  • [33] Habitat use and population structure of the shoal chub (Macrhybopsis hyostoma) in the upper Mississippi River basin
    Sarah Gaughan
    Kirk Steffensen
    Guoqing Lu
    Environmental Biology of Fishes, 2019, 102 : 901 - 914
  • [34] To all the gar I loved before: range-wide population genetic structure in Alligator gar
    Bohn, Sandra E.
    Kreiser, Brian R.
    Williford, Damon
    Anderson, Joel
    Karel, William
    CONSERVATION GENETICS, 2023, 24 (04) : 501 - 521
  • [35] A genetic analysis of dragonfly population structure
    Phillips, Payton
    Swanson, Bradley J.
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2018, 8 (14): : 7206 - 7215
  • [36] THE GENETIC DIVERSITY AND POPULATION STRUCTURE OF BARRED SAND BASS, PARALABRAX NEBULIFER: A HISTORICALLY IMPORTANT FISHERIES SPECIES OFF SOUTHERN AND BAJA CALIFORNIA
    Paterson, Corinne N.
    Chabot, Chris L.
    Robertson, Jeanne M.
    Jose Cota-Nieto, Juan
    Erisman, Brad
    Alen, Larry G.
    CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE OCEANIC FISHERIES INVESTIGATIONS REPORTS, 2015, 56 : 97 - 109
  • [37] Population structure, diet, and bioenergetics of introduced Smallmouth Bass in an Intermountain West reservoir
    Wolf, Skylar L.
    Boren, Natalie
    Vasquez, Benjamin
    Dudding, Jack
    Shields, Robert
    WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2022, 82 (03) : 494 - 509
  • [38] The Role of Directed Dispersal in Driving Genetic and Morphological Structure in Invasive Smallmouth Bass
    Diedericks, Genevieve
    Broeckhoven, Chris
    von der Heyden, Sophie
    Weyl, Olaf L. F.
    Hui, Cang
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2022, 9
  • [39] Novel genetic variation in an isolated population of the nationally critical Haast tokoeka (Apteryx australis "Haast') reveals extreme short-range structure within this cryptic and flightless bird
    White, Daniel J.
    Ramon-Laca, Ana
    Amey, Jacinda
    Robertson, Hugh A.
    CONSERVATION GENETICS, 2018, 19 (06) : 1401 - 1410
  • [40] Genetic detection and population structure of a non-native hybridogenic Poeciliopsis species in the Santa Cruz River of Arizona, USA
    Mussmann, Steven M.
    Duncan, Doug
    Mosher, Kent R.
    Stewart, William T.
    Reinthal, Peter N.
    Wilson, Wade D.
    BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2024, 26 (08) : 2607 - 2626