Utility of Digital Rectal Examination, Serum Prostate Specific Antigen, and Transrectal Ultrasound in the Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Developing Country Perspective

被引:9
|
作者
Kash, Deep Par [1 ]
Lal, Murli [1 ]
Hashmi, Altaf Hussain [1 ]
Mubarak, Muhammed [2 ]
机构
[1] Sindh Inst Urol & Transplantat SIUT, Dept Urol, Karachi, Pakistan
[2] Sindh Inst Urol & Transplantat SIUT, Dept Histopathol, Karachi, Pakistan
关键词
Biopsy; digital rectal examination; prostate cancer; transrectal ultrasound; Pakistan; MEN; PSA; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; ADENOCARCINOMA; VELOCITY; BIOPSIES; TRENDS; COHORT; ZONE;
D O I
10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.7.3087
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the utility of digital rectal examination (DRE), serum total prostate specific antigen (tPSA) estimation, and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Materials and Methods: All patients with abnormal DRE, TRUS, or serum tPSA >4ng/ml, in any combination, underwent TRUS-guided needle biopsy. Eight cores of prostatic tissue were obtained from different areas of the peripheral prostate and examined histopathologically for the nature of the pathology. Results: PCa was detected in 151 (50.3%) patients, remaining 149 (49.7%) showed benign changes with or without active prostatitis. PCa was detected in 13 (56.5%), 9 (19.1%), 26 (28.3%), and 103 (74.6%) of patients with tPSA <4 ng/ml, 4-10 ng/ml, 10-20 ng/ml and >20 ng/ml respectively. Only 13 patients with PCa had abnormal DRE and TRUS with serum PSA <4 ng/ml. The detection rate was highest in patients with tPSA >20 ng/ml. The association between tPSA level and cancer detection was statistically significant (p<0.01). Among 209 patients with abnormal DRE and raised serum PSA, PCa was detected in 128 (61.2%). Conclusions: The incidence of PCa increases with increasing serum level of tPSA. The overall screening and detection rate can be further improved by using DRE, TRUS and TRUS-guided prostate needle biopsies.
引用
收藏
页码:3087 / 3091
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A multicenter study on the detection of prostate cancer by digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen in men with or without urinary symptoms
    Gil, MJ
    Allepuz, C
    Rioja, LA
    Servet, HM
    Filella, X
    Molina, R
    Ballesta, AM
    Tallada, M
    Cozar, JM
    delasNieves, HV
    Arruza, A
    Pertusa, C
    Cruces, H
    Flores, N
    Zubiaur, C
    Basurto, H
    Ballesteros, JJ
    Esperanza, H
    Jimenez, JF
    Sanz, S
    LaFe, H
    Gallego, J
    Mingol, VF
    Guajardo, J
    Alija, J
    deVilanova, HA
    Camacho, E
    Garcia, M
    Valme, H
    Saladie, JM
    Comet, J
    Pujol, HGTI
    Leiva, O
    Rodriguez, A
    Solsona, E
    Casanova, JL
    Concepcion, T
    Banares, F
    Chicharro, JA
    Burgos, R
    Gonzalez, M
    Gomez, F
    Canalejo, HJ
    Sebastian, JL
    Millan, JA
    delCamino, HV
    Carballido, J
    deHierro, HP
    Palazon, J
    Ortiz, B
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1997, 32 (02) : 133 - 139
  • [22] Prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography: A meta-analysis for this diagnostic triad of prostate cancer in symptomatic Korean men
    Song, JM
    Kim, CB
    Chung, HC
    Kane, RL
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 46 (03) : 414 - 424
  • [23] DIAGNOSIS OF PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA - THE YIELD OF SERUM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION AND TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY
    ELLIS, WJ
    CHETNER, MP
    PRESTON, SD
    BRAWER, MK
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 152 (05) : 1520 - 1525
  • [24] Transrectal ultrasound in detecting prostate cancer compared with serum total prostate-specific antigen levels
    Tamsel, S.
    Killi, R.
    Hekimgil, M.
    Altay, B.
    Soydan, S.
    Demirpolat, G.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2008, 52 (01) : 24 - 28
  • [25] COMPARISON OF DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION AND SERUM PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN THE EARLY DETECTION OF PROSTATE CANCER: RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER CLINICAL TRIAL OF 6,630 MEN
    Catalona, William J.
    Richie, Jerome P.
    Ahmann, Frederick R.
    Hudson, M'Liss A.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Flanigan, Robert C.
    DeKernion, Jean B.
    Ratliff, Timothy L.
    Kavoussi, Louis R.
    Dalkin, Bruce L.
    Waters, W. Bedford
    MacFarlane, Michael T.
    Southwick, Paula C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (02) : S200 - S207
  • [26] Evaluation of prostatic specific antigen and digital rectal examination as screening tests for prostate cancer
    Candas, B
    Cusan, L
    Gomez, JL
    Diamond, P
    Suburu, RE
    Lévesque, J
    Brousseau, G
    Bélanger, A
    Labrie, F
    PROSTATE, 2000, 45 (01) : 19 - 35
  • [27] DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION, SERUM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, AND PROSTATIC ULTRASOUND - HOW EFFECTIVE IS THIS DIAGNOSTIC TRIAD
    HAID, M
    RABIN, D
    KING, KM
    FEINSTEIN, CM
    JANSON, KL
    LEVINE, SR
    MUTCHNIK, DL
    LAMBIASE, EA
    BRADLEY, R
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 56 (01) : 32 - 38
  • [28] Stratification of prostate-specific antigen level and results of transrectal ultrasonography and digital rectal examination as predictors of positive prostate biopsy
    Clark, TWI
    Goldenberg, SL
    Cooperberg, PL
    Wong, AD
    Singer, J
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 1997, 48 (04): : 252 - 258
  • [29] Correlation of digital rectal examination and serum prostate-specific antigen levels for detection of prostate cancer: Retrospective analysis results from a tertiary care urology center
    Sarkar, Debansu
    Jain, Pritesh
    Gupta, Piyush
    Pal, Dilip Kumar
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 18 (06) : 1646 - 1650
  • [30] Screening for prostate cancer without digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound:: Results after four years in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam
    Gosselaar, C
    Roobol, MJ
    Roemeling, S
    de Vries, SH
    van der Cruijsen-Koeter, I
    van der Kwast, TH
    Schröder, FH
    PROSTATE, 2006, 66 (06) : 625 - 631