Effects of different gestation housing types on reproductive performance of sows

被引:7
作者
Choe, Jeehwan [1 ]
Kim, Sheena [1 ]
Cho, Jin Ho [2 ]
Lee, Jeong Jae [1 ]
Park, Sangwoo [1 ]
Kim, Byeonghyeon [1 ]
Kim, Junsu [1 ]
Baidoo, Samuel K. [3 ]
Oh, Sangnam [4 ]
Kim, Hyeun Bum [5 ]
Song, Minho [1 ]
机构
[1] Chungnam Natl Univ, Dept Anim Sci & Biotechnol, Daejeon, South Korea
[2] Chungbuk Natl Univ, Div Food & Anim Sci, Cheongju, South Korea
[3] Univ Minnesota, Southern Res & Outreach Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Jeonju Univ, Dept Funct Food & Biotechnol, Jeonju, South Korea
[5] Dankook Univ, Dept Anim Resource Sci, Cheonan, South Korea
关键词
gestating sows; group housing; individual housing; reproductive performance; BEHAVIOR; STALLS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1111/asj.12977
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This study evaluated the effects of different gestation housing types on reproductive performance of sows. A total of 60 sows (218 +/- 24kg body weight) with mixed parity were used. During gestation, 28 sows were housed in groups with electronic sow feeders (space allowance=1.26m(2)/sow) and 32 sows were housed in individual stalls (space allowance=1.20m(2)/sow). Sows from both housing types were moved to farrowing crates on day 109 of gestation and stayed until weaning (18days post-farrowing). Typical corn-soybean meal diets were provided to sows during gestation and lactation. Measurements were reproductive performance of sows at farrowing as well as performance of sows and their litter during lactation. Similar total numbers of piglets born at farrowing were observed for sows gestated in both housing types. However, group-housed gestation sows had more mummies (0.321 vs. 0.064; P<0.05) and stillbirths (0.893 vs. 0.469; P=0.073) at farrowing than individual-housed gestation sows. Consequently, individual-housing type had higher percentage of piglets born alive (95.5 vs. 90.4%; P<0.05) than the group-housing type. Therefore, improved reproductive performance of sows from individual gestating housing was confirmed in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:722 / 726
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, NUTR REQ SWIN, DOI DOI 10.17226/13298
[2]  
AVMA, 2015, WELF IMPL GEST SOW H
[3]  
Backus GBC, 1997, REPORT RES I PIG HUS
[4]  
Barbari M, 2000, SWINE HOUSING, PROCEEDINGS, P188
[5]   Sow performance when housed either in groups with electronic sow feeders or stalls [J].
Bates, RO ;
Edwards, DB ;
Korthals, RL .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2003, 79 (01) :29-35
[6]   Effect of gestation housing on behaviour and skin lesions of sows in farrowing crates [J].
Boyle, LA ;
Leonard, FC ;
Lynch, PB ;
Brophy, P .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2002, 76 (02) :119-134
[7]   EVALUATION OF HOUSING SYSTEMS FOR SOWS [J].
DENHARTOG, LA ;
BACKUS, GBC ;
VERMEER, HM .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1993, 71 (05) :1339-1344
[8]   Stress and its influence on reproduction in pigs: a review [J].
Einarsson, Stig ;
Brandt, Ylva ;
Lundeheim, Nils ;
Madej, Andrzej .
ACTA VETERINARIA SCANDINAVICA, 2008, 50 (1)
[9]  
FAWC, 2012, 5 FREED
[10]  
Hewson CJ, 2003, CAN VET J, V44, P496