What Do Teachers Think About Their Students' Inclusion? Consistency of Students' Self-Reports and Teacher Ratings

被引:31
作者
Venetz, Martin [1 ]
Zurbriggen, Carmen L. A. [2 ]
Schwab, Susanne [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci Special Needs Educ, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bielefeld, Fac Educ Sci, Bielefeld, Germany
[3] Univ Vienna, Dept Educ, Vienna, Austria
[4] North West Univ, Res Focus Area Optentia, Vanderbijipark, South Africa
关键词
self-report; teacher rating; assessment accuracy; inclusion; academic self-concept; SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL-NEEDS; MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD DATA; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR MODELS; OF-FIT INDEXES; ACADEMIC-ACHIEVEMENT; JUDGMENTS; ACCURACY; STRENGTHS; DISABILITIES; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01637
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to investigate the consistency between the self-reports and teacher ratings of students' emotional and social inclusion at school as well as for their academic self-concept. The German version of the Perceptions of Inclusion Questionnaire (PIQ) was administered to 329 grade 8 students (50.8% female, M-age = 14.5 years, SDage = 0.5 years) and their teachers. First, the three-dimensional structure of both PIQ versions was confirmed by confirmatory item factor analysis. The alpha and omega coefficients demonstrated good reliability for all scales. Second, a correlated trait-correlated method minus one model provided evidence that the method-specificity of teacher ratings was larger than the consistency between the self-reports and teacher ratings. Third, the results of a latent difference model indicated that general method effects can partly be explained by a student's gender or special educational needs. Finally, the low consistency between self-reports and teacher rating is discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, MPLUS VERSION 81 BAS
[2]   Inclusion: by choice or by chance? [J].
Armstrong, Derrick ;
Armstrong, Ann Cheryl ;
Spandagou, Ilektra .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION, 2011, 15 (01) :29-39
[3]  
ARTELT C, 2014, LEARNING, P27
[4]  
Bear GG, 2002, SCHOOL PSYCHOL REV, V31, P405
[5]   Truly included? A literature study focusing on the social dimension of inclusion in education [J].
Bossaert, Goele ;
Colpin, Hilde ;
Pijl, Sip Jan ;
Petry, Katja .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION, 2013, 17 (01) :60-79
[6]   CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDATION BY THE MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRIX [J].
CAMPBELL, DT ;
FISKE, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1959, 56 (02) :81-105
[7]   LEARNING-DISABLED CHILDRENS SELF-CONCEPTS [J].
CHAPMAN, JW .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1988, 58 (03) :347-371
[8]   Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance [J].
Chen, Fang Fang .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2007, 14 (03) :464-504
[9]   The acceptance and rejection of peers with ADHD and ASD in general secondary education [J].
de Boer, Anke ;
Pijl, Sip Jan .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 109 (03) :325-332
[10]   Do learners with special education needs really feel included? Evidence from the Perception of Inclusion Questionnaire and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire [J].
DeVries, Jeffrey M. ;
Voss, Stefan ;
Gebhardt, Markus .
RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2018, 83 :28-36