Comparison of Adaboost with MultiBoosting for Phishing Website Detection

被引:32
作者
Subasi, Abdulhamit [1 ]
Kremic, Emir [2 ]
机构
[1] Effat Univ, Coll Engn, Jeddah 21478, Saudi Arabia
[2] Fed Inst Stat, Sarajevo 71000, Bosnia & Herceg
来源
COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS | 2020年 / 168卷
关键词
Web threat; Phishing Website; Adaboost; MultiBoosting; Ensemble Classifiers; FEATURES; ATTACKS; URL;
D O I
10.1016/j.procs.2020.02.251
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Developments in the Internet introduced new trends. Innovations in Internet bring challenges to our security and expectations of privacy. The anonymous structure of the Internet has such a big attack surface that possess increased risks from cyber-attacks. Attackers introduced novel techniques, such as phishing, to take their vulnerable information such as account IDs, usernames, passwords, etc. Phishing is defined as mimicking a creditable company's website aiming to take private information of a user. It is a challenge to realize whether a web page is legitimate or phishing, because of its semantics-based attack structure that mostly exploits the Internet users' vulnerabilities. Several remedies proposed in order to prevent phishing. Although software companies introduced novel anti-phishing techniques that utilize heuristics, blacklists, visual and machine learning methods, only one single magic bullet cannot eliminate these threats entirely. Ensemble machine learning techniques are promising methods employed to distinguish phishing attacks. In this study, an intelligent phishing website detection framework is presented. We employed different machine learning models to classify websites as legitimate or phishing. Several classification techniques were employed in order to implement precise intelligent phishing website detection framework. Classification accuracy, F-measure and area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC) are utilized to evaluate the performance of the machine learning methods. Experimental results revealed that Adaboost with SVM has outperformed best among the classification methods by achieving the highest accuracy 97.61%. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 278
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Intelligent phishing detection system for e-banking using fuzzy data mining
    Aburrous, Maher
    Hossain, M. A.
    Dahal, Keshav
    Thabtah, Fadi
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (12) : 7913 - 7921
  • [2] Ensemble SVM Method for Automatic Sleep Stage Classification
    Alickovic, Emina
    Subasi, Abdulhamit
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2018, 67 (06) : 1258 - 1265
  • [3] Alpaydin E., 2009, INTRO MACHINE LEARNI
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2004, COMBINING PATTERN CL
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2018, IEEE INT C SEMANT CO, DOI DOI 10.1109/ICSC.2018.00056
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2018, J AMBIENT INTELL HUM
  • [7] Heuristic nonlinear regression strategy for detecting phishing websites
    Babagoli, Mehdi
    Aghababa, Mohammad Pourmahmood
    Solouk, Vahid
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2019, 23 (12) : 4315 - 4327
  • [8] Intelligent phishing detection and protection scheme for online transactions
    Barraclough, P. A.
    Hossain, M. A.
    Tahir, M. A.
    Sexton, G.
    Aslam, N.
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2013, 40 (11) : 4697 - 4706
  • [9] An empirical comparison of voting classification algorithms: Bagging, boosting, and variants
    Bauer, E
    Kohavi, R
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 1999, 36 (1-2) : 105 - 139
  • [10] Brown G., 2011, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning, P312