Balancing divergence and convergence in transdisciplinary research teams

被引:36
作者
Boon, Wouter P. C. [1 ,2 ]
Chappin, Maryse M. H. [1 ]
Perenboom, Jaap
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Rathenau Inst, NL-2509 CJ The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
Joint knowledge production; Co-production; Transdisciplinarity; Project governance; Climate adaptation; JOINT KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION; NETWORKS; SCIENCE; PROJECTS; ORGANIZATION; INFORMATION; EXPLORATION; PERFORMANCE; SUCCESS; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2014.04.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Climate adaptation projects often involve joint knowledge production, including different stakeholders and disciplines. One of the main challenges of transdisciplinary research projects is to balance the convergence and divergence of epistemic contributions. We explore to what extent organisational embedding of project teams, input in the project, and project governance influence project performance in climate adaptation projects. Our results indicate that aligning incentive systems and lower partner diversity lead to higher effectiveness and satisfaction. Project size enhances effectiveness, but decreases satisfaction. Satisfaction is enhanced by committed project members. Furthermore, dealing with diverse partner sets and large teams is not eased by careful management in the course of the project. Careful balancing of divergence and convergence should be taken into account during the design stage of these projects. In the context of knowledge co-production for environmental challenges, project management should proactively consider project structure, required level of partner diversity and project size. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 68
页数:12
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] The routinization of innovation research: a constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science
    Anderson, N
    De Dreu, CKW
    Nijstad, BA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2004, 25 (02) : 147 - 173
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, CASIMIR FORCE CASIMI
  • [3] Taking Stock of Temporary Organizational Forms: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda
    Bakker, Rene M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2010, 12 (04) : 466 - 486
  • [4] Baum JAC, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P267, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<267::AID-SMJ89>3.0.CO
  • [5] 2-8
  • [6] The mechanisms of collaboration in inventive teams: Composition, social networks, and geography
    Bercovitz, Janet
    Feldman, Maryann
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (01) : 81 - 93
  • [7] Europe adapts to climate change: Comparing National Adaptation Strategies
    Biesbroek, G. Robbert
    Swart, Rob J.
    Carter, Timothy R.
    Cowan, Caroline
    Henrichs, Thomas
    Mela, Hanna
    Morecroft, Michael D.
    Rey, Daniela
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2010, 20 (03): : 440 - 450
  • [8] Demand articulation in emerging technologies: Intermediary user organisations as co-producers?
    Boon, Wouter P. C.
    Moors, Ellen H. M.
    Kuhlmann, Stefan
    Smits, Ruud E. H. M.
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (02) : 242 - 252
  • [9] PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT - PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE-DIRECTIONS
    BROWN, SL
    EISENHARDT, KM
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1995, 20 (02) : 343 - 378
  • [10] The organization of scientific collaborations
    Chompalov, I
    Genuth, J
    Shrum, W
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2002, 31 (05) : 749 - 767