Ontology-Based Fragmented Company Knowledge Integration: Multi-aspect Ontology Building

被引:1
作者
Shilov, Nikolay [1 ]
Teslya, Nikolay [1 ]
机构
[1] SPIIRAS, St Petersburg, Russia
来源
BUSINESS INFORMATION SYSTEMS WORKSHOPS, BIS 2019 | 2019年 / 373卷
关键词
Multi-aspect ontology; Interoperability; Knowledge management; Ontology building; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-36691-9_16
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Early steps of ongoing digital transformation in companies is often driven by local business needs and results in usage of various information systems aimed at assisting in solving particular tasks. However, this leads to a dead end and further transformation is not possible without integration, what, in turn, requires interoperability support. The solution that seems to be the most simple is to use one complex system. However, various legacy systems used in various departments of companies have accumulated large volumes of corporate information and knowledge that are not easy to transfer into another system. Besides, spending time of specialists to learn different systems instead of those they are used to is not the best idea either. Though, the problem technical interoperability support is solved through usage of commonly accepted standards, the semantic interoperability is still an issue. In the previous paper, research results related to selection of the most appropriate solution for building a common information model enabling seamless knowledge exchange preserving existing information models was presented. This paper makes a step further through building a multi-aspect ontology taking into account differences between terminologies used in various information systems.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 189
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Borsato Milton, 2010, International Journal of Business and Systems Research, V4, P278, DOI 10.1504/IJBSR.2010.032951
[2]   A TRANSLATION APPROACH TO PORTABLE ONTOLOGY SPECIFICATIONS [J].
GRUBER, TR .
KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION, 1993, 5 (02) :199-220
[3]  
Hemam Mounir, 2011, International Journal of Reasoning-based Intelligent Systems, V3, P147, DOI 10.1504/IJRIS.2011.043539
[4]  
Hemam M., 2018, INT J ADV INTELLIGEN, V10, P1, DOI [10.1504/IJAIP.2018.10003857, DOI 10.1504/IJAIP.2018.10003857]
[5]   A new paradigm for the continuous alignment of business and IT: Combining enterprise architecture modelling and enterprise ontology [J].
Hinkelmann, Knut ;
Gerber, Aurona ;
Karagiannis, Dimitris ;
Thoenssen, Barbara ;
van der Merwe, Alta ;
Woitsch, Robert .
COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2016, 79 :77-86
[6]  
McGuinness DeborahL., 2004, W3C RECOMMENDATION
[7]   Business and Information Technology Alignment Measurement - A Recent Literature Review [J].
Munoz, Leonardo ;
Avila, Oscar .
BUSINESS INFORMATION SYSTEMS WORKSHOPS (BIS 2018), 2019, 339 :112-123
[8]  
Ordiyasa I. Wayan, 2016, 2016 2nd International Conference on Science and Technology - Computer (ICST). Proceedings, P102, DOI 10.1109/ICSTC.2016.7877356
[9]  
Oroszi A., 2009, International Journal of Product Development, Vol, V8 No, P162, DOI [10.1504/IJPD.2009.024186, DOI 10.1504/IJPD.2009.024186]
[10]  
Smirnov Alexander, 2013, International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, V6, P322, DOI 10.1504/IJPLM.2013.063210