Are patients with cancer with sepsis and bacteraemia at a higher risk of mortality? A retrospective chart review of patients presenting to a tertiary care centre in Lebanon

被引:46
作者
Abou Dagher, Gilbert [1 ]
El Khuri, Christopher [1 ]
Chehadeh, Ahel Al-Hajj [1 ]
Chami, Ali [1 ]
Bachir, Rana [1 ]
Zebian, Dina [1 ]
Chebl, Ralphe Bou [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Beirut, Lebanon
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 03期
关键词
GOAL-DIRECTED RESUSCITATION; RESPONSE SYNDROME SIRS; INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS; UNITED-STATES; SEPTIC SHOCK; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ANTIBIOTICS; SURVIVAL; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013502
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Most sepsis studies have looked at the general population. The aim of this study is to report on the characteristics, treatment and hospital mortality of patients with cancer diagnosed with sepsis or septic shock. Setting: A single-centre retrospective study at a tertiary care centre looking at patients with cancer who presented to our tertiary hospital with sepsis, septic shock or bacteraemia between 2010 and 2015. Participants: 176 patients with cancer were compared with 176 cancer-free controls. Primary and secondary outcomes: The primary outcome of this study was the in hospital mortality in both cohorts. Secondary outcomes included patient demographics, emergency department (ED) vital signs and parameters of resuscitation along with laboratory work. Results: A total of 352 patients were analysed. The mean age at presentation for the cancer group was 65.39 +/- 15.04 years, whereas the mean age for the control group was 74.68 +/- 14.04 years (p< 0.001). In the cancer cohort the respiratory system was the most common site of infection (37.5%) followed by the urinary system (26.7%), while in the cancer-free arm, the urinary system was the most common site of infection (40.9%). intravenous fluid replacement for the first 24 hours was higher in the cancer cohort. ED, intensive care unit and general practice unit length of stay were comparable in both the groups. 95 (54%) patients with cancer died compared with 75 (42.6%) in the cancer-free group. The 28-day hospital mortality in the cancer cohort was 87 (49.4%) vs 46 (26.1%) in the cancer-free cohort (p= 0.009). Patients with cancer had a 2.320 (CI 95% 1.225 to 4.395, p= 0.010) odds of dying compared with patients without cancer in the setting of sepsis. Conclusions: This is the first study looking at an indepth analysis of sepsis in the specific oncology population. Despite aggressive care, patients with cancer have higher hospital mortality than their cancerfree counterparts while adjusting for all other variables.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Defining cancer patients as being in the terminal phase: Who receives a formal diagnosis, and what are the effects? [J].
Aabom, B ;
Kragstrup, J ;
Vondeling, H ;
Bakketeig, LS ;
Stovring, H .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (30) :7411-7416
[2]  
ALLEGRETTA GJ, 1985, PEDIATR CLIN N AM, V32, P613
[3]  
[Anonymous], CRIT CARE MED
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, NEW ENGL J MED, DOI DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1401602
[5]   Dexamethasone in patients with acute lung injury from acute monocytic leukaemia [J].
Azoulay, E. ;
Canet, E. ;
Raffoux, E. ;
Lengline, E. ;
Lemiale, V. ;
Vincent, F. ;
de Labarthe, A. ;
Seguin, A. ;
Boissel, N. ;
Dombret, H. ;
Schlemmer, B. .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2012, 39 (03) :648-653
[6]   Mortality in Emergency Surgical Oncology [J].
Bosscher, M. R. F. ;
van Leeuwen, B. L. ;
Hoekstra, H. J. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (05) :1577-1584
[8]   The Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) in acutely hospitalised medical patients: a cohort study [J].
Comstedt, Pal ;
Storgaard, Merete ;
Lassen, Annmarie T. .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 17
[9]  
DELLINGER RP, 2013, INTENS CARE MED, V39, P165, DOI DOI 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8
[10]   Benchmarking the Incidence and Mortality of Severe Sepsis in the United States [J].
Gaieski, David F. ;
Edwards, J. Matthew ;
Kallan, Michael J. ;
Carr, Brendan G. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (05) :1167-1174