TDMA Versus CSMA/CA for Wireless Multihop Communications: A Stochastic Worst-Case Delay Analysis

被引:24
作者
Wang, Qi [1 ]
Jaffres-Runser, Katia [2 ]
Xu, Yongjun [1 ]
Scharbarg, Jean-Luc [2 ]
An, Zhulin [1 ]
Fraboul, Christian [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Comp Technol, Beijing 100864, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Toulouse, INPT, Inst Rech Informat Toulouse, F-31061 Toulouse, France
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CSMA/CA; IEEE802.11; DCF; stochastic worst-case end-to-end delay; time division multiple access (TDMA); wireless multihop networks; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1109/TII.2016.2620121
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Wireless networks have become a very attractive solution for soft real-time data transport in the industry. For such technologies to carry real-time traffic, reliable bounds on end-to-end communication delays have to be ascertained to warrant a proper system behavior. As for legacy wired embedded and real-time networks, two main wireless multiple access methods can be leveraged: one is time division multiple access (TDMA), which follows a time-triggered paradigm, and the other is carrier sense multiple access with collision avoidance (CSMA/CA), which follows an event-triggered paradigm. This paper proposes an analytical comparison of the time behavior of two representative TDMA and CSMA/CA protocols in terms of the worst-case end-to-end delay. This worst-case delay is expressed in a probabilistic manner because our analytical framework captures the versatility of the wireless medium. Analytical delay bounds are obtained from delay distributions, which are compared to fine-grained simulation results. Exhibited study cases show that TDMA can offer smaller or larger worst-case bounds than CSMA/CA depending on its settings.
引用
收藏
页码:877 / 887
页数:11
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, PROC POWER TECH 2013, DOI DOI 10.1088/0953-8984/25/9/095002
[2]   Performance analysis,of the IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function [J].
Bianchi, G .
IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS, 2000, 18 (03) :535-547
[3]   Modelling and Performance Analysis of Wireless Sensor Networks Using Process Mining Techniques: ContikiMAC use case [J].
Despaux, Francois ;
Song, Ye-Qiong ;
Lahmadi, Abdelkader .
2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING IN SENSOR SYSTEMS (IEEE DCOSS 2014), 2014, :225-232
[4]  
Fehnker A, 2007, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V4591, P253
[5]  
Fidler M., 2006, P IEEE GLOBECOM, V2006, P1
[6]   Reliability Calculus: A Theoretical Framework To Analyze Communication Reliability [J].
He, Wenbo ;
Liu, Xue ;
Zheng, Long ;
Yang, Hao .
2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING SYSTEMS ICDCS 2010, 2010,
[7]   Modeling and worst-case dimensioning of cluster-tree Wireless Sensor Networks [J].
Koubaa, Anis ;
Alves, Mario ;
Tovar, Eduardo .
27TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL REAL-TIME SYSTEMS SYMPOSIUM, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, :412-+
[8]   Tight end-to-end per-flow delay bounds in FIFO multiplexing sink-tree networks [J].
Lenzini, Luciano ;
Martorini, Linda ;
Mingozzi, Enzo ;
Stea, Giovanni .
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, 2006, 63 (9-10) :956-987
[9]   Formal Verification of Real-Time Wireless Sensor Networks Protocols: Scaling Up [J].
Mouradian, Alexandre ;
Auge-Blum, Isabelle .
2014 26TH EUROMICRO CONFERENCE ON REAL-TIME SYSTEMS (ECRTS 2014), 2014, :41-50
[10]   WirelessHART Versus ISA100.11a The Format War Hits the Factory Floor [J].
Petersen, Stig ;
Carlsen, Simon .
IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS MAGAZINE, 2011, 5 (04) :23-34