Effectiveness and Safety of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Versus Local Bone Graft in Primary Lumbar Interbody Fusions

被引:24
|
作者
Adams, Cameron Louis [1 ]
Ogden, Kathryn [1 ]
Robertson, Iain Kilpatrick [2 ]
Broadhurst, Stephen [3 ]
Edis, David [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Sch Med, Launceston, Tas 7250, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Sch Human Life Sci, Launceston, Tas 7250, Australia
[3] Univ Tasmania, Launceston, Tas 7250, Australia
[4] Univ Tasmania, Launceston Hosp, Launceston, Tas 7250, Australia
关键词
bone morphogenetic protein; local bone graft; lumbar fusion; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; SPINE SURGERY; RHBMP-2; OSTEOLYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; OUTCOMES; SERIES;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000000089
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Retrospective cohort study. Objective. To compare clinical outcomes, fusion rates, and rates of complications in posterior lumbar interbody fusions (PLIFs) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures with either recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) and local bone graft (LBG) or LBG alone used as graft material. Summary of Background Data. rhBMP-2 is often used in PLIF and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures, but is associated with complications. Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that using LBG may be sufficient to induce fusion. Methods. All patients who underwent primary interbody fusions under a single surgeon were identified from the surgeon's records. In November 2008, the surgeon changed from routinely using LBG to using LBG and rhBMP-2 routinely, limiting selection bias. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data preoperatively and up to 12 months postoperatively was performed. Data collected included visual analogue scale, pain scores for back and leg, Oswestry Disability Index scores, Short-Form 36 (SF-36), standing lumbar radiographs, and clinical notes. Results. Seventy-seven patients met the study criteria and 70 consented to be part of the study. Fifty-one were treated with rhBMP-2 and 19 with LBG. At 12-month follow-up, no significant differences were seen in visual analogue scale score, Oswestry Disability Index score, or SF-36 scores. A total of 89.5% of the LBG group and 94.1% of the rhBMP-2 group went on to show radiographical evidence of fusion by 12-month follow-up (P = 0.61). The rhMBP-2 group had a higher complication rate (41.2% vs. 10.5%, incidence rate ratio = 3.91, P = 0.05). Conclusion. In comparison we found no difference in clinical outcomes, comparable rates of fusion and a significant increase in complication rates with rhBMP-2. Using rhBMP-2 may unnecessarily increase the risk of complication in routine PLIF and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 171
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 and collagen for bone regeneration
    Hollinger, JO
    Schmitt, JM
    Buck, DC
    Shannon, R
    Joh, SP
    Zegzula, HD
    Wozney, J
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1998, 43 (04): : 356 - 364
  • [22] Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in the treatment of bone fractures
    Ghodadra, Neil
    Singh, Kern
    BIOLOGICS-TARGETS & THERAPY, 2008, 2 (03): : 345 - 354
  • [23] BONE CELL INDUCTION BY RECOMBINANT HUMAN BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN-2
    ALPASLAN, C
    IRIE, K
    OHASHI, N
    SAKAI, H
    KENMOTSU, S
    TAKAHASHI, K
    EJIRI, S
    NAKAJIMA, T
    OZAWA, H
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 (03) : 971 - 971
  • [24] Expression of bone morphogenetic protein in the course of osteoinduction by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2
    Okubo, Y
    Bessho, K
    Fujimura, K
    Kusumoto, K
    Ogawa, Y
    Iizuka, T
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2002, 13 (01) : 80 - 85
  • [25] Effectiveness and Complications Associated With Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Augmentation of Foot and Ankle Fusions and Fracture Nonunions
    Rearick, Timothy
    Charlton, Timothy P.
    Thordarson, David
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 35 (08) : 783 - 788
  • [26] Transforaminal interbody fusion and the "off label" use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2
    Vaidya, Raul
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (08): : 667 - 669
  • [27] Reconstruction of the primate mandible with a combination graft of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 and bone marrow
    Seto, I
    Asahina, I
    Oda, M
    Enomoto, S
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2001, 59 (01) : 53 - 61
  • [28] Six-Year Outcomes of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Arthrodesis with Use of Interbody Fusion Cages and Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2
    Burkus, J. Kenneth
    Gornet, Matthew F.
    Shuler, Thomas C.
    Kleeman, Thomas J.
    Zdeblick, Thomas A.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A (05): : 1181 - 1189
  • [29] Six-Year Outcomes of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Arthrodesis with Use of Interbody Fusion Cages and Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2
    Smoljanovic, Tomislav
    Siric, Franjo
    Bojanic, Ivan
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2010, 92A (15): : 2614 - 2615
  • [30] Formation of Painful Seroma and Edema After the Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 in Posterolateral Lumbar Spine Fusions
    Garrett, Mark P.
    Kakarla, Udaya K.
    Porter, Randall W.
    Sonntag, Volker K. H.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 66 (06) : 1044 - 1049