Flood Damage Modeling on the Basis of Urban Structure Mapping Using High-Resolution Remote Sensing Data

被引:34
作者
Gerl, Tina [1 ]
Bochow, Mathias [2 ,3 ]
Kreibich, Heidi [1 ]
机构
[1] Helmholtz Ctr Potsdam, German Res Ctr Geosci GFZ, Sect Hydrol, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Helmholtz Ctr Potsdam, German Res Ctr Geosci GFZ, Sect Remote Sensing, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[3] Univ Bayreuth, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany
关键词
flood risk; flood loss estimation; FLEMOps; regression tree; remote sensing; land use/land cover classification; urban structure types; RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS; RISK; UNCERTAINTY; CITY; MANAGEMENT; FLEMOPS; RIVER;
D O I
10.3390/w6082367
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The modeling of flood damage is an important component for risk analyses, which are the basis for risk-oriented flood management, risk mapping, and financial appraisals. An automatic urban structure type mapping approach was applied on a land use/land cover classification generated from multispectral Ikonos data and LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) data in order to provide spatially detailed information about the building stock of the case study area of Dresden, Germany. The multi-parameter damage models FLEMOps (Flood Loss Estimation Model for the private sector) and regression-tree models have been adapted to the information derived from remote sensing data and were applied on the basis of the urban structure map. To evaluate this approach, which is suitable for risk analyses, as well as for post-disaster event analyses, an estimation of the flood losses caused by the Elbe flood in 2002 was undertaken. The urban structure mapping approach delivered a map with a good accuracy of 74% and on this basis modeled flood losses for the Elbe flood in 2002 in Dresden were in the same order of magnitude as official damage data. It has been shown that single-family houses suffered significantly higher damages than other urban structure types. Consequently, information on their specific location might significantly improve damage modeling, which indicates a high potential of remote sensing methods to further improve risk assessments.
引用
收藏
页码:2367 / 2393
页数:27
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1984, OLSHEN STONE CLASSIF, DOI 10.2307/2530946
[2]  
[Anonymous], STADTOKOLOGIE FACHBU
[3]   Flood risk analyses-how detailed do we need to be? [J].
Apel, H. ;
Aronica, G. T. ;
Kreibich, H. ;
Thieken, A. H. .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2009, 49 (01) :79-98
[4]   Monitoring Urban Structure Types as Spatial Indicators With CIR Aerial Photographs for a More Effective Urban Environmental Management [J].
Banzhaf, Ellen ;
Hoefer, Rene .
IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2008, 1 (02) :129-138
[5]  
Beak Consultants GmbH, 2006, ERM SCHAD HOCHW ELB
[6]   Disaster management -: Flood risk in central Europe [J].
Becker, A ;
Grünewald, U .
SCIENCE, 2003, 300 (5622) :1099-1099
[7]  
Bochow M., 2010, URBAN BIODIVERSITY D, P255
[8]  
Bochow M, 2010, AUTOMATISIERUNGSPOTE
[9]   AN AUTOMATED AND ADAPTABLE APPROACH FOR CHARACTERIZING AND PARTITIONING CITIES INTO URBAN STRUCTURE TYPES [J].
Bochow, Mathias ;
Taubenboeck, Hannes ;
Segl, Karl ;
Kaufmann, Hermann .
2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2010, :1796-1799
[10]  
Breunig M, 2009, 2009 JOINT URBAN REMOTE SENSING EVENT, VOLS 1-3, P24