The evaluation of a multifaceted intervention to promote "speaking up" and strengthen interprofessional teamwork climate perceptions

被引:41
作者
Ginsburg, Liane [1 ]
Bain, Lorna [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] York Univ, Sch Hlth Policy & Management, 4700 Keele St,HNES Bldg 413, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
[2] Southlake Reg Hlth Ctr, Interprofess Collaborat & Educ, Newmarket, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Occupat Sci & Occupat Therapy, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Communication; multifaceted intervention; quasi-experiment; speaking up; teamwork; training workshop; HEALTH-CARE POLICY; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; PATIENT SAFETY; IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES; TRANSLATING EVIDENCE; PRACTICE SINGLE; SIMPLE ANSWER; SIMULATION; COMMUNICATION; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1080/13561820.2016.1249280
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Communication failure is a leading cause of error and is often due to inhibition of individuals to speak up in interprofessional healthcare environments. The present study sought to evaluate the impact of a multifaceted intervention designed to promote speaking up on teamwork climate in one clinical department of a large community hospital based in Canada. The multifaceted intervention included a role-playing simulation workshop, teamwork climate data feedback and facilitated discussion with the interprofessional team (discussion briefings), and other department-led initiatives to promote trust, teamwork, and speaking up among interprofessional team members. A quasi-experiment (pretest-posttest control group design, using two posttests several months apart) was used to evaluate the impact of the complete intervention on individual teamwork climate perceptions. The intervention was implemented with an intact interprofessional team (the Emergency DepartmentED) in 2014. The intensive care unit (ICU) was used as the control unit. Survey response rates were the highest at time 1 (83/102=81% for the ED and 29/31=94% for the ICU) and the lowest at time 3 (38/105=36% for the ED and 14/30=47% for the ICU). The results obtained from paired and unpaired analyses suggest that this type of multifaceted approach can improve staff perceptions of teamwork climate. The teamwork climate score in the ED was significantly higher at follow-up (Mt2=3.42, SD=0.66) compared to baseline (Mt1=3.13, SD=0.72), (F(1,34)=12.2, p=.001, eta(2)p=.263), while baseline and follow-up scores were not significantly different between baseline and follow-up for the ICU group (Mt1=4.12, SD=0.60; Mt2=4.15, SD=0.56; F(1, 34)=0.06, p=.806, eta(2)p=.002). Sustaining high levels of participation in interprofessional initiatives and engaging physicians remain challenging when interventions are used in context. Improving team communication is a broad and challenging area that continues to require attention.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 217
页数:11
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Cross-functional team processes and patient functional improvement
    Alexander, JA
    Lichtenstein, R
    Jinnett, K
    Wells, R
    Zazzali, J
    Liu, DW
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2005, 40 (05) : 1335 - 1355
  • [2] [Anonymous], EXPT QUASIEXPERIMENT
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, INTERPRESSIONAL TE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2014, IBM SPSS STAT WINDOW
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2008, SAFETY COMPETENCIES
  • [6] Attree Moira, 2007, J Nurs Manag, V15, P392, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00679.x
  • [7] Teamwork as an essential component of high-reliability organizations
    Baker, David P.
    Day, Rachel
    Salas, Eduardo
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2006, 41 (04) : 1576 - 1598
  • [8] Barr H., 2005, Effective interprofessional education: argument, assumption and evidence (promoting partnership for health), DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470776445
  • [9] Using SBAR to improve communication in interprofessional rehabilitation teams
    Boaro, Nancy
    Fancott, Carol
    Baker, Ross
    Velji, Karima
    Andreoli, Angie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2010, 24 (01) : 111 - 114
  • [10] Team structure, team climate and the quality of care in primary care: an observational study
    Bower, P
    Campbell, S
    Bojke, C
    Sibbald, B
    [J]. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 12 (04): : 273 - 279