Are agri-environment schemes successful in delivering conservation grazing management on saltmarsh?

被引:6
|
作者
Mason, Lucy R. [1 ]
Feather, Alastair [1 ]
Godden, Nick [1 ]
Vreugdenhil, Chris C. [1 ]
Smart, Jennifer [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] RSPB, RSPB Ctr Conservat Sci, Sandy, Beds, England
[2] Univ East Anglia, Sch Biol Sci, Norwich, Norfolk, England
关键词
agri-environment schemes; countryside stewardship; grazing; higher level stewardship; livestock; saltmarsh; site condition; wetlands; BRACKISH MARSHES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; GREAT-BRITAIN; BIODIVERSITY; DENSITY; SEA; VEGETATION; BENEFITS; IMPACTS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2664.13405
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Grasslands occur around the globe and, in temperate regions, their natural management by fire, drought and wild herbivores has largely been replaced by grazing with domestic livestock. Successful management for agriculture is not always suitable for conservation and can have a detrimental effect on biodiversity. Conservation grazing of saltmarshes, delivered through agri-environment schemes, may provide a solution to counteract biodiversity loss by providing farmers with financial incentives to graze these internationally important coastal wetlands more sensitively. To assess whether conservation grazing is being achieved and whether agri-environment schemes are effective in delivering this management, we conducted a national survey on English saltmarshes, scoring the management on each site as optimal, suboptimal or detrimental in terms of suitability for achieving conservation aims for five aspects of grazing: presence, stock type, intensity, timing and habitat impact. Although most saltmarshes suitable for grazing in England were grazed, conservation grazing was not being achieved. Sites under agri-environment management for longer did score higher and approached optimal levels in terms of grazing intensity in one region, but sites with agri-environment agreements were no more likely to be grazed at optimal conservation levels than sites without them overall, indicating that agri-environment schemes, in their current form, are an ineffective delivery mechanism for conservation grazing on saltmarsh. The low specificity of agri-environment prescription wording may contribute to this failure, with prescriptions either being vague or specifying suboptimal or detrimental management objectives, particularly for grazing intensity, timing and stock type. These objectives are often set too high or too low, during unsuitable periods or using stock types inappropriate for achieving conservation aims. Synthesis and applications. Our national survey indicates that agri-environment schemes are not currently delivering conservation grazing on English saltmarshes. Agri-environment schemes are the only mechanism through which such grazing can be implemented on a national scale, so improving their effectiveness is a priority. Policymakers, researchers and managers need to work together to ensure better translation of conservation guidelines into schemes, increasing the specificity of management prescriptions and improving understanding of the need for management measures. A more detailed and reliable system of auditing to ensure that management activities are taking place would be beneficial or alternatively moving to a results-based scheme where payments are made on desirable outcomes rather than on evidence of management.
引用
收藏
页码:1597 / 1609
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An Application of Boundary Organisation Theory to Develop Landscape-scale Conservation in Formal Agri-environment Schemes
    Franks, Jeremy R.
    SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2016, 56 (01) : 48 - 73
  • [22] Stakeholder perceptions of the effectiveness and efficiency of agri-environment schemes in enhancing pollinators on farmland
    Austin, Zoe
    Penic, Maja
    Raffaelli, David G.
    White, Piran C. L.
    LAND USE POLICY, 2015, 47 : 156 - 162
  • [23] Agri-environment schemes and foraging of barn owls Tyto alba
    Askew, Nicholas P.
    Searle, Jeremy B.
    Moore, Niall P.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 118 (1-4) : 109 - 114
  • [24] Do agri-environment schemes result in improved water quality?
    Jones, J. Iwan
    Murphy, John F.
    Anthony, Steven G.
    Arnold, Amanda
    Blackburn, John H.
    Duerdoth, Chas P.
    Hawczak, Adrianna
    Hughes, Greg O.
    Pretty, James L.
    Scarlett, Peter M.
    Gooday, Richard D.
    Zhang, Yusheng S.
    Fawcett, Laura E.
    Simpson, Diane
    Turner, Anthony W. B.
    Naden, Pamela S.
    Skates, James
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2017, 54 (02) : 537 - 546
  • [25] Improving the link between payments and the provision of ecosystem services in agri-environment schemes
    Reed, Mark S.
    Moxey, Andrew
    Prager, Katrin
    Hanley, Nick
    Skates, James
    Bonn, Aletta
    Evans, Chris D.
    Glenk, Klaus
    Thomson, Ken
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 9 : 44 - 53
  • [26] Upland grassland habitats and agri-environment schemes change soil microarthropod abundance
    Arnott, Amy
    Riddell, Gillian
    Emmerson, Mark
    Caruso, Tancredi
    Reid, Neil
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2021, 58 (10) : 2256 - 2265
  • [27] Functional responses in habitat selection as a management tool to evaluate agri-environment schemes for farmland birds
    Ogawa, Ryo
    Engler, Jan O.
    Cord, Anna F.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2024, 494
  • [28] Upland rush management advocated by agri-environment schemes increases predation of artificial wader nests
    Kelly, L. A.
    Douglas, D. J. T.
    Shurmer, M. P.
    Evans, K. L.
    ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2021, 24 (04) : 646 - 658
  • [29] Fodder crop management benefits Northern Lapwing (Vanellus vanellus) outside agri-environment schemes
    McCallum, Heather M.
    Wilson, Jeremy D.
    O'Brien, Mark G.
    Beaumont, David
    Sheldon, Robert
    Park, Kirsty J.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 265 : 470 - 475
  • [30] Multi-scale effects of agri-environment schemes on carabid beetles in intensive farmland
    Caro, G.
    Marrec, R.
    Gauffre, B.
    Roncoroni, M.
    Augiron, S.
    Bretagnolle, V.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 229 : 48 - 56