Veterinary antibiotics influence trigonelline biosynthesis and plant growth in Arachis hypogaea L.

被引:9
|
作者
Devireddy, Amith R. [1 ,2 ]
Inupakutika, Madhuri A. [1 ,2 ]
Willmon, David [1 ]
Kakarla, Prathusha [1 ]
Puppala, Naveen [3 ]
Cho, Youngkoo [1 ]
机构
[1] Eastern New Mexico Univ, Dept Biol, Portales, NM 88130 USA
[2] Univ North Texas, Dept Biol Sci, Denton, TX USA
[3] New Mexico State Univ, Agr Sci Ctr, Clovis, NM USA
关键词
Abiotic stress; antibiotics; Arachis hypogaea L; genotypes; trigonelline; OXIDATIVE STRESS; GLYCINE-MAX; NICOTINAMIDE; METABOLISM; RESISTANCE; TETRACYCLINE; ACCUMULATION; AGRICULTURE; PROMOTION; BACTERIA;
D O I
10.1080/09064710.2016.1250941
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Antibiotics from various sources such as livestock waste are being accumulated in the soil. The excessive uptake of antimicrobial agents by plants has been a major concern as it is currently unknown how plants respond to the presence of antibiotics in agricultural lands. The objectives were to analyze the alteration of trigonelline (TRG) biosynthesized by plants in response to various antibiotic stresses and to evaluate the ability of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) plants to resist the deleterious impacts of antibiotic uptake. Three veterinary antibiotics used in this study were tetracycline, streptomycin sulfate, and chloramphenicol in the concentrations of 2.5 and 5 mg L-1. Mean TRG amounts were 53.4 +/- 1.6 and 59.9 +/- 1.1 gg(-1) dry weight (DW) in Spanish as treated with growth chloramphenicol and streptomycin at 2.5 mgL(-1), respectively, and were significantly (p .05) different compared to the control (40.4 +/- 1.6 gg(-1) DW) of Spanish. Spanish genotype treated with chloramphenicol at 5 mgL(-1) had a mean TRG amount of 41.0 +/- 1.0 gg(-1) DW and improved yield, with the average pod number of 29.6 +/- 7.6 and pod weight of 20.1 +/- 6.1 g. TRG was continuously biosynthesized and increased under antibiotic stress up to 12.7% at full pod (R4 growth stage) and 139.1% at beginning maturity (R7), but declined 20.2% at the harvest stage (R8) in all combined genotypes when compared with TRG amounts (21.7 +/- 0.6 gg(-1) DW) at the flowering R1 stage.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 251
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Influence of Salt Stress on Growth of Spermosphere Bacterial Communities in Different Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Cultivars
    Xu, Yang
    Zhang, Dai
    Dai, Liangxiang
    Ding, Hong
    Ci, Dunwei
    Qin, Feifei
    Zhang, Guanchu
    Zhang, Zhimeng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2020, 21 (06)
  • [22] Karyotypic studies in Arachis hypogaea L. varieties
    Inés, LG
    Fernández, A
    CARYOLOGIA, 2004, 57 (04) : 353 - 359
  • [23] The rosette disease of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Storey, HH
    Bottomley, AM
    ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 1928, 15 (01) : 26 - 45
  • [24] Boron mobility in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Sawika Konsaeng
    Bernard Dell
    Benjavan Rerkasem
    Plant and Soil, 2010, 330 : 281 - 289
  • [25] Boron mobility in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Konsaeng, Sawika
    Dell, Bernard
    Rerkasem, Benjavan
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2010, 330 (1-2) : 281 - 289
  • [26] A new coumestan from Arachis hypogaea L.
    Fu, HW
    Zhang, HL
    Pei, YH
    CHINESE CHEMICAL LETTERS, 2005, 16 (07) : 918 - 920
  • [27] A New Coumestan from Arachis hypogaea L.
    Hong Wei FU
    ChineseChemicalLetters, 2005, (07) : 918 - 920
  • [28] INFLUENCE OF GROWTH REGULATORS ON CALLUS INDUCTION AND PLANT REGENERATION IN ARACHIS PROSTRATA (L.)
    Bera, S. K.
    Singh, A. L.
    Gedia, M. V.
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2014, 37 (03) : 281 - 286
  • [29] Effect of radiation-modified kappa-carrageenan as plant growth promoter on peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Abad, Lucille V.
    Aurigue, Fernando B.
    Montefalcon, Djowel Recto V.
    Manguiat, Proceso H.
    Carandang, Florita F.
    Mabborang, Sancho A.
    Hizon, Mark Gil S.
    Abella, Matt Ezekiel S.
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2018, 153 : 239 - 244
  • [30] Plant Growth–Promoting Methylobacterium Induces Defense Responses in Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Compared with Rot Pathogens
    M. Madhaiyan
    B. V. Suresh Reddy
    R. Anandham
    M. Senthilkumar
    S. Poonguzhali
    S. P. Sundaram
    Tongmin Sa
    Current Microbiology, 2006, 53 : 270 - 276