Evaluation of Hip Geometry Parameters in Patients With a Distal Radius Fracture

被引:2
作者
Shin, Young Ho [1 ]
Gong, Hyun Sik [2 ,3 ]
Kim, Kyoung Min [3 ,4 ]
Lee, Jeong Hyun [2 ,3 ]
Kwon, Ohsang [2 ,3 ]
Baek, Goo Hyun [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Seoungnam Si, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Seoungnam Si, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Seoungnam Si, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Distal radius fracture; hip geometry; cross-sectional area; neck shaft angle; PROXIMAL FEMUR; RISK-ASSESSMENT; FEMORAL-NECK; WOMEN; MEN; PREDICTION; STRENGTH; OSTEOPOROSIS; SCORE; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocd.2019.06.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Patients with a distal radius fracture (DRF) have an increased risk of subsequent fractures including hip fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether women with a DRF have certain hip geometry parameters known to indicate susceptibility to hip fractures. Methods: We compared bone min-eral density (BMD) and hip geometry parameters (hip axis length, neck shaft angle, mean cortical thickness, femur neck width, cross-sectional area [CSA], cross-sectional moment of inertia, section modulus, and buckling ratio) in 181 women with a DRF (DRF group) and 362 propensity score-matched women without a fracture (control group). We evaluated the associations between DRF and hip geometry parameters using logistic regression analysis. Results: The DRF group had lower hip BMD; lower cortical thickness, CSA, and section modulus; and higher buckling ratio than the control group (all p < 0.05). The occurrence of a DRF was significantly associated with decreases in neck shaft angle (odds ratio [OR], 1.047; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.008-1.088) and CSA (OR, 3.114; 95% CI, 1.820-5.326) after adjusting for age, BMI, and total hip BMD. Conclusions: In this study, women with a DRF were more likely than women without a DRF to have hip geometry parameters known to indicate susceptibility to hip fractures. Our results suggest that not only low hip BMD but also a decreased CSA could account for the increased risk of subsequent hip fracture in patients with a DRF.
引用
收藏
页码:576 / 581
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Contribution of hip strength indices to hip fracture risk in elderly men and women [J].
Ahlborg, HG ;
Nguyen, ND ;
Nguyen, TV ;
Center, JR ;
Eisman, JA .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2005, 20 (10) :1820-1827
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser, V843, P1
[3]   Structural trends in the aging femoral neck and proximal shaft: Analysis of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data [J].
Beck, TJ ;
Looker, AC ;
Ruff, CB ;
Sievanen, H ;
Wahner, HW .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2000, 15 (12) :2297-2304
[4]   Hip fracture risk and proximal femur geometry from DXA scans [J].
Bergot, C ;
Bousson, V ;
Meunier, A ;
Laval-Jeantet, M ;
Laredo, JD .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 13 (07) :542-550
[5]   Fracture Risk Prediction by Non-BMD DXA Measures: the 2015 ISCD Official Positions Part 1: Hip Geometry [J].
Broy, Susan B. ;
Cauley, Jane A. ;
Lewiecki, Michael E. ;
Schousboe, John T. ;
Shepherd, John A. ;
Leslie, William D. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2015, 18 (03) :287-308
[6]  
D'Agostino RB, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P2265, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::AID-SIM918>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-B
[8]   Exploring the relationship between bone density and severity of distal radius fragility fracture in women [J].
Dhainaut, Alvilde ;
Daibes, Kamil ;
Odinsson, Adalsteinn ;
Hoff, Mari ;
Syversen, Unni ;
Haugeberg, Glenn .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2014, 9
[9]  
Evans JD, 1996, 1996 STRAIGHTFORWARD
[10]   Femur strength index predicts hip fracture independent of bone density and hip axis length [J].
Faulkner, KG ;
Wacker, WK ;
Barden, HS ;
Simonelli, C ;
Burke, PK ;
Ragi, S ;
Del Rio, L .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 17 (04) :593-599