Improving the Positive Predictive Value of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS)

被引:12
|
作者
Strom, Charles M. [1 ]
Anderson, Ben [1 ]
Tsao, David [1 ]
Zhang, Ke [1 ]
Liu, Yan [1 ]
Livingston, Kayla [1 ]
Elzinga, Christopher [2 ]
Evans, Matthew [2 ]
Quoclinh Nguyen [1 ]
Wolfson, David [3 ]
Rowland, Charles [3 ]
Kolacki, Paula [1 ]
Maxwell, Megan [1 ]
Wang, Jia-Chi [1 ]
Rabin, Douglas [1 ]
Catanese, Joseph [1 ]
Owen, Renius [1 ]
Braastad, Corey [2 ]
Sun, Weimin [1 ]
机构
[1] Quest Diagnost Nichols Inst, San Juan Capistrano, CA USA
[2] Athena Diagnost, Marlborough, MA USA
[3] Celera Diagnost, Alameda, CA USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 03期
关键词
FREE DNA ANALYSIS; MATERNAL PLASMA; TRISOMIES; 21; ANEUPLOIDY; EXPERIENCE; TRISOMY-13; DIAGNOSIS; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0167130
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We evaluated performance characteristics of a laboratory-developed, non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) assay for fetal aneuploidies. This assay employs massively parallel shotgun sequencing with full automation. GC sequencing bias correction and statistical smoothing were performed to enhance discrimination of affected and unaffected pregnancies. Maternal plasma samples from pregnancies with known aneuploidy status were used for assay development, verification, and validation. Assay verification studies using 2,085 known samples (1873 unaffected, 69 trisomy 21, 20 trisomy 18, 17 trisomy 13) demonstrated complete discrimination between autosomal trisomy (Z scores >8) and unaffected (Z scores <4) singleton pregnancies. A validation study using 552 known samples (21 trisomy 21, 10 trisomy 18, 1 trisomy 13) confirmed complete discrimination. Twin pregnancies showed similar results. Follow-up of abnormal results from the first 10,000 clinical samples demonstrated PPVs of 98% (41/42) for trisomy 21, 92% (23/25) for trisomy 18, and 69% (9/13) for trisomy 13. Adjustment for causes of false-positive results identified during clinical testing (eg, maternal duplications) improved PPVs to 100% for trisomy 21 and 96% for trisomy 18. This NIPS test demonstrates excellent discrimination between trisomic and unaffected pregnancies. The PPVs obtained in initial clinical testing are substantially higher than previously reported NIPS methods.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A method for improving the accuracy of non-invasive prenatal screening by cell-free foetal DNA size selection
    He, Q. Z.
    Wu, X. J.
    He, Q. Y.
    Xiang, J. J.
    Zhang, C. H.
    Lu, L.
    Wang, T.
    Li, H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 75 (03) : 133 - 138
  • [22] Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): Reliability, Challenges, and Future Directions
    Jayashankar, Siva Shantini
    Nasaruddin, Muhammad Luqman
    Hassan, Muhammad Faiz
    Dasrilsyah, Rima Anggrena
    Shafiee, Mohamad Nasir
    Ismail, Noor Akmal Shareela
    Alias, Ekram
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (15)
  • [23] A new era in prenatal care: non-invasive prenatal testing in Switzerland
    Manegold-Brauer, Gwendolin
    Bellin, Anjeung Kang
    Hahn, Sinuhe
    De Geyter, Christian
    Buechel, Johanna
    Hoesli, Irene
    Lapaire, Olav
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2014, 144
  • [24] Current status of non-invasive prenatal testing in Japan
    Samura, Osamu
    Sekizawa, Akihiko
    Suzumori, Nobuhiro
    Sasaki, Aiko
    Wada, Seiji
    Hamanoue, Haruka
    Hirahara, Fumiki
    Sawai, Hideaki
    Nakamura, Hiroaki
    Yamada, Takahiro
    Miura, Kiyonori
    Masuzaki, Hideaki
    Nakayama, Setsuko
    Okai, Takashi
    Kamei, Yoshimasa
    Namba, Akira
    Murotsuki, Jun
    Tanemoto, Tomohiro
    Fukushima, Akimune
    Haino, Kazufumi
    Tairaku, Shinya
    Matsubara, Keiichi
    Maeda, Kazuhisa
    Kaji, Takashi
    Ogawa, Masanobu
    Osada, Hisao
    Nishizawa, Haruki
    Okamoto, Yoko
    Kanagawa, Takeshi
    Kakigano, Aiko
    Kitagawa, Michihiro
    Ogawa, Masaki
    Izumi, Shunichiro
    Katagiri, Yukiko
    Takeshita, Naoki
    Kasai, Yasuyo
    Naruse, Katsuhiko
    Neki, Reiko
    Masuyama, Hisashi
    Hyodo, Maki
    Kawano, Yukie
    Ohba, Takashi
    Ichizuka, Kiyotake
    Kido, Yasuhiro
    Fukao, Toshiyuki
    Miharu, Norio
    Nagamatsu, Takeshi
    Watanabe, Atsushi
    Hamajima, Naoki
    Hirose, Masaya
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2017, 43 (08) : 1245 - 1255
  • [25] Advances in Non-invasive Prenatal Diagnosis
    Vaiopoulos, Aristeidis G.
    Athanasoula, Kalliopi C.
    Papantoniou, Nikolas
    Kolialexi, Aggeliki
    IN VIVO, 2013, 27 (02): : 165 - 170
  • [26] Clinical experience with non-invasive prenatal screening for single-gene disorders
    Mohan, P.
    Lemoine, J.
    Trotter, C.
    Rakova, I
    Billings, P.
    Peacock, S.
    Kao, C-Y
    Wang, Y.
    Xia, F.
    Eng, C. M.
    Benn, P.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 59 (01) : 33 - 39
  • [27] A decade of non-invasive prenatal screening in Australia: National impact on prenatal screening and diagnostic testing
    Hui, Lisa
    Halliday, Jane
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 63 (02) : 264 - 267
  • [28] Aneuploidy screening by non-invasive prenatal testing in twin pregnancy
    Fosler, L.
    Winters, P.
    Jones, K. W.
    Curnow, K. J.
    Sehnert, A. J.
    Bhatt, S.
    Platt, L. D.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 49 (04) : 470 - 477
  • [29] Novel Algorithms for Improved Sensitivity in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing
    Johansson, L. F.
    de Boer, E. N.
    de Weerd, H. A.
    van Dijk, F.
    Elferink, M. G.
    Schuring-Blom, G. H.
    Suijkerbuijk, R. F.
    Sinke, R. J.
    te Meerman, G. J.
    Sijmons, R. H.
    Swertz, M. A.
    Sikkema-Raddatz, B.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [30] Non-invasive Prenatal Testing in Pregnancies Following Assisted Reproduction
    Kamath, Vandana
    Chacko, Mary Purna
    Kamath, Mohan S.
    CURRENT GENOMICS, 2022, 23 (05) : 326 - 336