Laparoscopic lymph node dissection using ultrasonically activated shears: Comparison with electrosurgery

被引:14
作者
Holub, Z
Jabor, A
Kliment, L
Lukac, J
Voracek, J
机构
[1] Baby Friendly Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Endoscop Training Ctr, Kladno 27258, Czech Republic
[2] Baby Friendly Hosp, Dept Biochem & Stat Anal, Kladno 27258, Czech Republic
来源
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES-PART A | 2002年 / 12卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1089/10926420260188065
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To assess and compare perioperative parameters in two groups of patients treated by different laparoscopic techniques of lymph node dissection (LND) for gynecologic cancer. Patients and Methods: Between April 1996 and March 2001, 59 consecutive women with microinvasive cervical cancer (N = 5) or clinical stage I endometrial cancer (N = 54) underwent laparoscopic LND during a primary staging procedure using an electrosurgery (ELC) or ultrasonic (US) operative technique. The two groups were compared for perioperative outcomes. Differences between the two groups were determined by the Wilcoxon's rank-sum test. Results: Laparoscopic LND and other staging procedures were completed successfully in 58 women (98.3%). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with regard to perioperative outcomes (operation time, time for LND, blood loss, hospital stay, complications), but there was a significant difference (P = 0.0008) in the number of lymph nodes harvested: a mean of 13.7 in the ELC group and 17.5 in the US group. The pathologists found that the reading of histology slides was easier after US dissections because of the greater depth of thermal injury in the lymphatic tissue in ELC group. Conclusion: The US operative technique ensures efficient coagulation, cutting, dissection, and grasping for laparoscopic LND in patients with cervical and endometrial cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 180
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
AMARAL JF, 1994, SURG LAPAROSC ENDOSC, V4, P92
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, ENVAHISSEMENT GANGLI
[3]   Thoracoscopic resection of the lung with the ultrasonic scalpel [J].
Aoki, T ;
Kaseda, S .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1999, 67 (04) :1181-1183
[4]   The harmonic scalpel: An intraoperative complication [J].
Awwad, JT ;
Isaacson, K .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 88 (04) :718-720
[5]  
Chi DS, 1999, ONCOLOGY-NY, V13, P773
[6]   The virtues and pitfalls of minimally invasive surgery for gynecological malignancies: an update [J].
Childers, JM .
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 11 (01) :51-59
[7]   LAPAROSCOPICALLY ASSISTED SURGICAL STAGING (LASS) OF ENDOMETRIAL CANCER [J].
CHILDERS, JM ;
BRZECHFFA, PR ;
HATCH, KD ;
SURWIT, EA .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1993, 51 (01) :33-38
[8]  
CREASMAN WT, 1987, CANCER, V60, P2035, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19901015)60:8+<2035::AID-CNCR2820601515>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-8
[10]   Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: Laparoscopy or laparotomy? [J].
Eltabbakh, GH ;
Shamonki, MI ;
Moody, JM ;
Garafano, LL .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2000, 78 (03) :329-335