Legal changes to increase access to naloxone for opioid overdose reversal in the United States

被引:124
作者
Davis, Corey S. [1 ]
Carr, Derek [2 ]
机构
[1] Network Publ Hlth Law, Los Angeles, CA 90010 USA
[2] Network Publ Hlth Law, Carrboro, NC 27510 USA
关键词
Naloxone; Opioids; Overdose; Law; Public health; STANDING ORDER PROGRAMS; NEW-YORK-CITY; INDUCED RESPIRATORY DEPRESSION; SEXUALLY-TRANSMITTED-DISEASES; EMERGENCY MEDICAL-SERVICES; EXPEDITED PARTNER THERAPY; INJECTION-DRUG USERS; INTRANASAL NALOXONE; HEROIN OVERDOSE; INFLUENZA VACCINATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.10.013
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Opioid overdose, which has reached epidemic levels in the United States, is reversible by administration of the medication naloxone. Naloxone requires a prescription but is not a controlled substance and has no abuse potential. In the last half-decade, the majority of states have modified their laws to increase layperson access to the medication. Methods: We utilized a structured legal research protocol to systematically identify and review all statutes and regulations related to layperson naloxone access in the United States that had been adopted as of September, 2015. Each law discovered via this process was reviewed and coded by two trained legal researchers. Results: As of September, 2015, 43 states and the District of Columbia have passed laws intended to increase layperson naloxone access. We categorized these laws into three domains: (1) laws intended to increase naloxone prescribing and distribution, (2) laws intended to increase pharmacy naloxone access, and (3) laws intended to encourage overdose witnesses to summon emergency responders. These laws vary greatly across states in such characteristics as the types of individuals who can receive a prescription for naloxone, whether laypeople can dispense the medication, and immunity provided to those who prescribe, dispense and administer naloxone or report an overdose emergency. Conclusions: Most states have now passed laws intended to increase layperson access to naloxone. While these laws will likely reduce overdose morbidity and mortality, the cost of naloxone and its prescription status remain barriers to more widespread access. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 120
页数:9
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Obstet Gynecol, V125, P1526, DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000466366.67312.8c
[2]   Intranasal naloxone in suspected opioid overdose [J].
Ashton, H ;
Hassan, Z .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2006, 23 (03) :221-224
[3]   Naloxone for Opioid Overdose Prevention: Pharmacists' Role in Community-Based Practice Settings [J].
Bailey, Abby M. ;
Wermeling, Daniel P. .
ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2014, 48 (05) :601-606
[4]   Police Officers' and Paramedics' Experiences with Overdose and Their Knowledge and Opinions of Washington State's Drug Overdose-Naloxone-Good Samaritan Law [J].
Banta-Green, Caleb J. ;
Beletsky, Leo ;
Schoeppe, Jennifer A. ;
Coffin, Phillip O. ;
Kuszler, Patricia C. .
JOURNAL OF URBAN HEALTH-BULLETIN OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE, 2013, 90 (06) :1102-1111
[5]   Are Standing Order Programs Associated With Influenza Vaccination? - NNHS, 2004 [J].
Bardenheier, Barbara H. ;
Shefer, Abigail M. ;
Lu, Peng-jun ;
Remsburg, Robin E. ;
Marsteller, Jill A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2010, 11 (09) :654-661
[6]  
Barton Erik D, 2002, Prehosp Emerg Care, V6, P54, DOI 10.1080/10903120290938797
[7]   Physicians' knowledge of and willingness to prescribe naloxone to reverse accidental opiate overdose: Challenges and opportunities [J].
Beletsky, Leo ;
Ruthazer, Robin ;
Macalino, Grace E. ;
Rich, Josiah D. ;
Tan, Litjen ;
Burris, Scott .
JOURNAL OF URBAN HEALTH-BULLETIN OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE, 2007, 84 (01) :126-136
[8]  
Bigg D., 2002, 4 NAT HARM RED C SEA
[9]  
Blake Valarie, 2012, AM MED ASS J ETHICS, V14, P404
[10]   Opioid-induced respiratory depression is associated with increased tidal volume variability [J].
Bouillon, T ;
Bruhn, J ;
Roepcke, H ;
Hoeft, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 20 (02) :127-133